Derby Co-op (5)
Home Up Autobiography Rochdale Pioneers Leeds Co-op Jubilee Co-operation Bygones Public Speaking Among the Americans The Reasoner Miscellaneous Site Search Main Index


[Previous Page]

A Libeller Brought to Book.


AS a general rule co-operative societies never go to law with outsiders, nor with themselves.  In cases of difference of opinion among members their rule provides that any question in dispute shall be decided by arbitration.  Now and then a society is assailed by tradesmen, who disparage it by misrepresentation.  When the misrepresentation is flagrant the society may take legal steps to vindicate itself.  In one instance the Derby Society had to do this, and the story of the trial is sufficiently instructive to be told.

    In 1892, one John Wells, trading under the name of "J. Wells and Co." issued 25,000 handbills which the Society deemed libellous, and resolved to bring the libeller to book.

    Now, the law in these cases is that a Co-operative Society registered under the Industrial and Provident Societies Act, 1876, may sue and be sued in the perpetual succession and a common seal.  There is no single definition of a libel which can definitely guide those concerned as to what is libellous.  Each case must be considered in the light of its own circumstances.  A society however which considers that it has been libelled has, before commencing legal proceedings, to determine either that—(1) It has been prejudicially affected by the written or printed statement in such a manner as would have given a right of action had the persons affected been private individuals instead of a society; or, (2) That the written, or printed, statement, impeaches the credit of the society, by imputing to it fraud or dishonesty, or any mean and dishonourable trickery in the conduct of its business, or which in any other manner is prejudicial to it in the way of its employment or trade.



    If the libel is contained in a printed handbill or pamphlet, which does not bear a printer's name, there is a penalty prescribed for that omission.  This law is seldom enforced, except in cases of libel.  What the law is, as respects omission of the printer's name, it may be useful to state here, as it is far from being generally known.



    With reference to the "printing and distributing of handbills which do not bear the printer's name and place of business at the foot thereof," 2 and 3 Vict., chap. 12, section 2, provides that "every person, who after the passing of this Act, shall print any paper or book whatsoever, which shall be meant to be published or dispersed, and who shall not print upon the part of every such paper, if the same shall be printed on one side only, or upon the first and last leaf of every paper or book, which shall consist of more than one leaf, in legible characters, his or her name and usual place of abode or business, and every person who shall publish or disperse, or assist in publishing or dispersing, any printed paper or book, on which the name and place of abode of the person printing the same shall not be printed as aforesaid, shall for every copy of such paper so printed by him or her, forfeit a sum of not more than £5."

    The action against Mr. Wells was tried before Lord Chief Justice Coleridge, at the Derby Summer Assizes, July, 1892.  The plaintiffs were the Co-operative Society which was defended by Mr. M. C. Buszard, Q.C., and Mr. Graham, instructed by Messrs. Moody and Woolley, of Derby.  Mr. Buszard stated that Mr. Wells was charged by the Co-operative Society with having published a libel upon them in relation to their business. Mr. BUSZARD said: "The society was incorporated under the Provident Societies Act, and carried on an extensive business in the town as retail dealers in provisions and various other things.  Mr. Wells was a rival dealer in the provision line, carrying on a somewhat similar business in various shops.  The Co-operative Society consisted of over 8,000 members belonging entirely to the artisan class.  Their capital amounted to £106,000, accumulated by the artisan class, on which they received interest of 5 per cent, and for every sovereign they spent at the store they received, every quarter, a dividend which generally amounted to 2s. 6d.  Mr. Wells issued a handbill entitled '£1,000 reward, startling but true,' then followed a statement purported to be made under oath by Elizabeth Thompson, of No. 5 Court, Bridge Gate, Derby, who had been to the co-operative store and made sundry purchases, at prices which were compared with the lower prices for which it was alleged, the same things could be bought at Wells and Co.  She asked for, and had the best things which were compared with the prices at which very inferior things were sold by Mr. Wells."  A further allegation was made against the printer (whose name Mr. Wells endeavoured to conceal).  The printer, Mr. Bacon, to whom Mr. Wells gave an order for 25,000 bills, (being an honest printer), represented that if the bills bore no printer's name there would be risk to him.  Mr. Wells did not want any name to appear, as his personal action in the matter might be traced.  Mr. J. H. Etherington Smith, who defended Wells, sought to show that printers often sent out bills without their name.

    Lord COLERIDGE said: "It was not of the slightest value for them to know what other people do.  What had Mr. Bacon done? was the question."

    Mr. SMITH pleaded that it was "a sort of special advertisement."

    Lord COLERIDGE said: "It was very special, no doubt, but its alleged meaning was that the goods purchased at the store were sold at a higher price than they could be purchased at Mr. Well's shops, and it asked the people of Derby whether they got a fair return for their money.  He (his Lordship) did not suppose the jury would think that was an innocent rule-of-three sum."

    Mr. HENRY HOROBIN, an assistant in the grocery store, gave evidence as to the way in which Mrs. Thompson made her purchases.  It ought to be recorded that Mrs. Thompson regretted the use made of her, of which she was not aware.

    Then Mr. JOHN SWIFT, the secretary of the society, gave evidence.  "The society," he said, "was managed by a board principally consisting of the better class of artisans.  They had 8,100 members, the great majority of them were of the artisan class, a large number of them were railway men (10,000 being employed at the head-quarters of the Midland Railway Company).  The capital of the Co-operative Society was £109,231. 11s. 2d."  Mr. Swift was very exact in his detail.  He said the society dealt in 209 different articles.  Mr. Wells had only selected 16.  The average dividend was 2s. 5¾d.  They were more than dealers.  The society had spent hundreds of pounds on education—had given £200 towards building the new Royal Infirmary, and £50 towards building the Deaf and Dumb Institution.

    Lord COLERIDGE, in summing up, gave an admirable statement of the aims and character of the Derby Co-operative Society.  He said: "The Co-operative Society of Derby is, I have no doubt, a very useful and excellent institution.  It has 8,100 members and a capital of nearly £110,000, and it conducts its business according to rules, which have been circulated by many thousands, and are accordingly well known to anybody who wants to do business with them.  I don't understand that they ever pretended to be simply and solely a trading corporation.  They did say that they were a trading corporation, making profits by trading operations, but at the same time doing a variety of other things.  First of all, by ready-money trading, they have an advantage in the market, but at the same time there are certain things which they do with their money, which is not trading at all.  They subscribe to charities; they help their members in educational matters; they do a variety of things which are not strictly trading, but still have to do with the profits in their trading.  Everybody who joins the society knows perfectly well that the payment of one shilling will make a man a member, and the moment he becomes a member he knows the terms upon which he has embarked.  Being a large society, it can carry on trade with considerable advantage, and it does carry on business at a great number of places in Derby.  It is almost impossible for a great firm, or a great house, to succeed beyond the ordinary run of success without doing so to the disadvantage of someone.  It is the condition of things in this country.  Competition, so long as it is carried out in an honest and straightforward way, is the life and soul of the commerce of England.  Mr. Wells may do all in his power to get everybody to deal with him.  But the law says that he must not do this by unfairly attacking the character of a rival trader.  If you do that, the law says it is not fair dealing.  Anything which is stated to a man's discredit is a slander and a libel, and if it is written down or printed, and especially if it is printed and published, unless you can show that what is stated or published is either privileged or true."

    Lord COLERIDGE summed up in favour of the society, and gave his opinion clearly that Mr. Wells' handbills, representing that the society was causing the people of Derby to incur "wicked waste," by buying at the store instead of buying at his shop, was libellous.  Thus Mr. Wells was brought to book and his tricks of trade exposed to all the country round.  The result was published by the society in these words.

    "The action for libel against Mr. John Wells, trading as J. Wells and Co., tried before Lord Chief Justice Coleridge and a special jury at the late assizes, resulted in a verdict for the society with 20s. damages and costs, with an injunction restraining J. Wells and Co. from issuing any more bills of the character of the one complained of.  The penalty action for publishing the bills without the printer's name being on, was settled by J. Wells and Co. agreeing to pay the society £50 towards their costs in this action.  We are pleased to note that the sympathy of the great bulk of the traders in the town has been strongly expressed in our favour."  Thus Mr. Wells lost money and character by his defamatory handbill.

    It is curious to record that Mr. Wells, the assailant of the society, had at that time numerous shops in Derby, since, he has gone down, and left the town, while the society has multiplied its branches, and remains in the administration of a larger business than ever.

    In 1891, the year before the trial, the subject of this chapter, the Monthly Record published a very effective advertisement worth citing.  It attacked no tradesman, it made no reflection upon anyone, but honestly showed what the society was doing.  It acted on the maxim of Antithenes: "A madman is not cured by another running mad also."


By Six Thousand Three Hundred and Seventy-seven working men in Derby an increased share of the comforts and luxuries of life, through an improvement in their social condition.  This improvement may be attributed to Co-operation, for in 1889 the sum of

£19,145  16  6

profit was realised by the members trading at their own shops.  These figures claim for co-operative enterprise a foremost position amongst the commercial undertakings of the present century.  Our ranks are daily being augmented by numbers of intelligent men, who are learning that


Co-operative Stores they may in reality "find," in the shape of dividends, hard cash wherewith to provide against sickness, infirmity, and old age.  This knowledge alone is of immense value to the


purchaser in this age of cheapness, as serious consequences sometimes result from the use of goods of inferior quality.  Thousands of members of Co-operative


have found incalculable advantages and benefits in time of need, by having a fund to which they could come and draw their own, and thus successfully pass over a time of difficulty.  Every working man can enjoy the same advantages by going to the Secretary, at his office,


and paying 1s. 5d. entrance fees, then, after trading at the Store, they will soon find out the benefits for themselves, and if they begin with the new year, when it comes to its close instead of having a few candles or an almanac for a Christmas box, they will have several pounds standing to their credit, and will thus have provided for a "rainy day," and be in as good a position as other men in


Another advertisement set forth as follows:—


    Derby has not been further troubled with libellers, and enjoys friendly relations with its neighbours, which, indeed, have in the main always, subsisted.



Committee of Management



R. HILLIARD and G. WOODHOUSE (who is President at this time).  These are the first presidents appointed by the members.  The committee formerly elected their own chairman.










































































There have been but two general managers—




There have been but three treasurers—



   »   W. F. TOWNSON


There have been but four secretaries during the existence of the society—


   »   GEORGE SMITH, 1860-1881

   »   JOHN SWIFT, 1881-1899

   »   J. B. REST, 1899


1. VICKERS KNOWLES, joined society September, 1889, elected auditor August,

2. GEORGE F. A. TITTLEY, joined society November, 1883, elected auditor
            November, 1894.

3. JOHN THORPE, joined society July, 1894, elected auditor May, 1897.

4. ARTHUR HEATH, joined society August, 1886, elected auditor November, 1899.

Distinction between Store-keeping and Shop-keeping.


IT is a duty in a special narrative of the success—not to say triumph—of a new form of trade, to vindicate it from the supposition of being unfair, or injurious, to its neighbours in business.  If co-operation has advantages it is owing to the intrinsic merits of its methods, its principles and benefits conferred upon its customer, which ordinary trading does not confer.  Neither shop-keepers as a rule, nor the general public, understand co-operation in practice.  This may be made clear by explaining the distinction between Store-keeping and Shop-keeping.  The principle on which a shop is founded, is the profit of the proprietor.  The principle on which the store is founded, is the profit of the customer.  The principle of the shop is cheapness, generally at the expense of the customer.  The principle of the store is excellence, by which the customer profits.  The shop measures excellence by cheapness—the store measures cheapness by excellence and trustworthiness.  The purchaser who thinks cheapness everything and thinks of nothing else, will corrupt any seller.  It is not wrong to look for cheapness—provided the cheapness includes good quality.  But he who makes cheapness the measure of quality asks for an adulterated article—and commonly gets it.



    Once a board of representative co-operators had to choose from tenders for the erection of a large building, when, to the astonishment of all who understood co-operation, a member, thought to have discernment, moved that the cheapest tender
be taken, and it was.  The motion was if not immoral at least inconsistent.  The board knew nothing of the principles of business of the lowest tender, and had no moral control over the practices of the firm; one tender came from a co-operative society, whose ability to do the work was undoubted, and whose principles of procedure were known.  That tender was rejected because it was a little higher than the cheapest.  If members of a store all acted upon the principle of taking the cheapest thing, it would be impossible to provide them with genuine articles.

    It is worth recalling the wise words of Henry Ward Beecher, who understood co-operation, as he did most things.  His words were: "It is the front part of the counter that corrupts the back part.  Men that sell are perverted by the men that buy.  Buyers seek 'bargains' instead of being willing to render an equivalent for what they receive."

    The purchaser at a shop has no right in it.  The purchaser at a store has.  He is one of the owners of it.  The buyer at a shop has no knowledge of the quality of what he buys, or whence it comes.  The buyer at a store knows, or can know, all about it.  The buyer at a shop knows nothing about its profits, and would be thought impertinent if he asked, and would be told it was no business of his.  But it is the business of a purchaser at a store to know what its profits are, and he has balance sheets furnished to him, from which he can know everything.  It does concern him to know what profits are made, because he has a share of them.  The accounts of a shop are secret, the accounts of a store are open.

    True, the store makes more profit than the shop, and the shopkeeper thinks that what the store gains he loses.  This is his mistake.  What we gain is not all taken from him.  The store has the larger number of customers and large numbers mean economy in expense of administration.  Besides the store buys with ready money.  That is another gain.  The shop keeper mostly buys on credit.  That is a loss to him.  The store takes ready money and has no bad debts.  The shop gives credit and stands to lose that way.  So the shop does not lose what the store gains.  The shop does not make it.  Besides, what profit custom makes the shop-keeper keeps, while the store gives it all to the customer and workers in it.  Thus, in a comparison of the shop and the co-operative store, the shop is not in it.

    We write no word of reproach because the shop-keeping is different from store-keeping.  Each acts on a different system.  The object of this chapter is merely to show that the two systems are intrinsically different and that co-operation has no reason to fear the competition which it supersedes.

    No doubt the shop-keeper suffers but little at our hands, though he often charges us with being harmful to him.  His enemies are of his own household.  It is the Shoolbreds and Maples, the Whiteleys and Liptons, who, by great capital destroy all the little dealers about them, plant shops in every town and compete with and undersell the honest private dealer.  These are the shop-keeper's enemies.  Why does he not attack them?  He could do it if he had unity and wit.  And he would show more wisdom than by imputing his difficulties to the co-operators.

    The shop does not suffer from the store.  Shop-keepers seek to undersell the store—the store never seeks to undersell the shop.  It is the interest of the co-operative system not to sell below the market rates, nor to lower the market.  Every day some ill-informed person will go into a store and say he can buy cheaper at the shops.  The shops have no customers who say they can buy cheaper at the store.  No store willingly joins in the miserable game of underselling its neighbours.  The more a customer pays at a store the more he saves—since it all comes back to him in his dividend.  Thus, the store has no interest in underselling the shop.  And the store, by keeping up fair prices, has made the fortunes of scores of shop-keepers in every town.  Were they wiser than they are, they would see it an advantage to them to have stores about them.  We have often made fortunes for them.  They never made any fortune for us.

    Much more might be said.  But sufficient for the purpose—is the evil thereof?  We have merely sought to show that the shop and the store represent two different systems, and stand side by side each on its own merits, and the shop has in some cases inextinguishable merits, as we might show if this were the place to do it.  Anyhow, there are now more than 42 millions of people in Great Britain, and not two millions of co-operators.  We leave to the shop-keepers 40 millions of customers.  Should they not be content?  Should they begrudge us our minority of adherents?

The New Trade and the Old Trade.


THE distinctions between the store and the shop, explained in the last chapter, will appear plainer still if we compare the new with the old methods of business.  Co-operation is a new system of trading.  It supersedes the old system—which is antediluvian.  Ever since the flood shop-keepers looked to doing business with people who did not know what they were buying.  It would be unjust, and therefore, unfair, not to own that shop-keepers have sometimes better goods to offer than they find customers for, with sufficient knowledge to perceive it; hence 'the saying, "If you offer pearls to swine they turn again and rend you."  Co-operators are liable to the same experience, but they provide against this by educating their customers.  The shop-keepers neglect to do this.  Mr. Augustine Birrell, M.P., has told us that the commercial motto of the City of London is—" Beware of the seller."  With the old school the dealer's trade is often a trick, or manœuvre, or war of wit, in which the unskilled or uninformed purchaser goes to the wall.  In co-operation the seller, as a member of the society, appoints or controls, or has controlling knowledge of the goods he offers at the counter, and has no interest in cheating himself or the customers.  The tradesman, as a rule, is as honestly-minded as co-operators; but he cannot do all he would.  He is in a competitive system, in which the interest of the dealer is first—the interest of the buyer second.  The co-operator is outside the competitive system.  He is a member of another system—quite different, in which "Each is for all and all for each"—and no private interest has to be consulted.  In true co-operation no one benefits at the expense of others.  All this is new trading, quite the reverse of the old system.  If anyone wants to see what the new system of trading does for its customers, let him go to New Normanton; there, five streets have been built by the store.  All those prosperous streets are owned by its customers, and owned because they have been its customers.

    The co-operator is pledged by his rules, to disclose to the purchaser anything he knows to the disadvantage of what he offers for sale.  If this were done by those who conduct business on the old method of trading, half the shops in every large town would have to be closed in six months.  The new trade educates its customers in the nature of commodities, so that they may know what to buy.  Do the old trade dealers do this?

    The two principles recognised by the new system are participation and education.  They are quite outside the range of the old form of trade.  Not only do the purchasers at the store share the profits, but the workers do.  Participation of profit with labour and trade; to use the language of the new South African diplomacy—is the one principle which has "paramountcy" in co-operation.  The store is founded upon it.  By mere wages all that can be commanded is the ordinary service rendered for wages.  But a man has more to sell than his labour.  He has his skill, his goodwill, and his capacity for economy.  Co-operation buys these.  In the labour market of old trade nothing is given for these profitable qualities.  Where profit is accorded, there is a claim upon their skill, goodwill, and active interests of all shop-servers and workers.  Sometimes, those who are accorded participation in gains take it as a matter of course, and do not concern themselves, or make any special effort to promote the prosperity of the society.  Upon such persons participation is thrown away, and they would have no right of complaint if they found themselves exchanged for other workers, with better discernment and a livelier appreciation of principle; for no one owes consideration to those who show no consideration for others.

    The amount of profit depends upon the sum taken in the shop, and the small amount of leakage made in distribution.  The persons who share profits in the Derby Society include all who serve behind the counter, the grocers, the meat tender, the drapers, the boot and shoemakers at the bench, and in the painting and hardware shops.  In the Coal Department, the draymen who go about the streets with coal have a rate per ton.  In the winter they earn £2. 3s. and even £2. 5s. a week.  In the bakehouse the men have a rate per bag, and the total earned per week is divided according to wages.  This is substantially profit-sharing, and is conceded as a right and as a reward for assiduity and intelligence.



    Liberty was a "bonus" in England in the days of the Plantagenets, revocable at the pleasure of the ruler.  It is now a right of every man, as profit is in true co-operation the right of all who work by hand or brain.  A certain portion of such earnings are deposited with the society to accumulate as a provision for domestic exigence, or old age pension.  The Romans discovered that labour extracted by fear and slaughter, by torture, or intrigue, was slovenly and insufficient, and they gave the cultivator an interest in the amount and quality of his work.

    Profit on service was first conceded to employees in 1883.  There was no resistance to it, or conflict about it.  The good sense of the committee proposed it, and the good sense of the members sustained it.  Now for examples of what this participation in profits, conceded by the Derby Society, means.  The coal trade, in the year 1885, received £101; the men in the Grocery and Meat Departments received £136 in addition to their ordinary wages.

    During the past six years, 1894 to 1900, the amount of profit given to shopmen is £4,382 over and above their wages.

    It may be said that in many businesses, foremen and superintendents are given a commission on profits made in their departments.  This is true.  But the commission given is not a reward so much for their superior skill, but as an inducement to get more work for less wages from those they engage or overlook.  What these heads of departments gain the workmen lose.  It is not in this way, nor in this spirit, that the new trade acts.

    Such are the advantages of the new trade, which is out of the range of the old trade.  But there is another and greater yet, and that is education.  Though education stands second here among the features of the store, it might stand first from its importance.  Hutton, the historian of the town, tells us that in his day there was no education to be had in Derby for youths of his class.  The first Sunday School Society was not founded until 1785, six years before Hutton published his "History of Derby." [8]  This society had two earnest champions—Rowland Hill, the father of Sir Rowland of Post-office renown, and Mrs. Hannah More, a famous authoress in her time.  She was considered a pioneer of elementary education for the people.  She confined her curriculum to "the Bible and the Catechism and such coarse work as may fit the children for servants."  "I allow," she says, "no writing for the poor."  The poor Derby youth who under such disadvantages made a name for himself in literature showed there was energy and capacity in the Derby blood.

    There are many who would not like to be thought enemies of education, and they sometimes believe they are its friends, yet in their hearts they care very little for it, and have no idea that knowledge is utility as well as pleasure.  They think they know enough as it is.  That is because they do not know how little they know.

    Freaks of intellect are as many and as entertaining as the freaks in Barnum and Bailey's Show, though it is not possible to embody and exhibit mental eccentricities.  Some have crooked souls.  They cannot think straight, nor see straight, nor speak straight, nor walk straight, nor act straight.  Many men talk like philosophers and live like fools, but they are not genuine idiots—only parrot philosophers.  Philosophy has got into their heads but not into their hearts, and not at all into their pockets.  There are some societies which provide for knowledge as though it were a charity, or a poor relation who could not take care of itself, whereas knowledge is a King, and the only power which enables the lame to walk, and the blind to see, and the impotent to act.  Ignorance gives a sort of eternity to prejudice, and perpetuity to error, and as the thoughtful pioneers found that prejudice and error were obstacles in their way which only education could remove, they wisely provided for it.

    The advocates of the new trade in Derby early understood this.  Education was started in 1864.  The society had the Old Assembly Room in Full Street, adjoining the secretary's office, which was used as a reading-room.  It had seven news papers and a few weekly and monthly periodicals.  It was free to members.  From 1877 votes were given for education and continue to the present time.  It was this faculty of intelligent discernment which caused them to make an early minute, "That we rent a reading-room at Full Street for the use of members from the Rev. Erskine Clarke and H. Holmes."  At a committee meeting on New Year's Day, 1868 (thirty-two years ago), they determined "to hold a public meeting at the opening of the reading-room, and Mr. Oldham and Mr. Smith were to solicit the Mayor to preside on the occasion."  What made them do this unless they saw that intelligence was a co-operative necessity.  In 1876, twenty-four years ago, a reading-room was opened in High Street, which was continued until the premises were taken down for a new building on the site.  Soon after a library, well-selected, was opened for the use of members.  The educational committee knew that education was a co-operative helper.  Knowledge is power, as those know who have it.  But as the Bishop of London told us at Peterborough, many forget that "ignorance is impotence."

    Being of this opinion the Derby Society endowed their educational committee with an income of 1 per cent of their total profits.  This is what the new trade store-keepers do.  Where are the old trade shop-keepers in our streets who do the like?


Characteristics of the Derby Society.


WE might call this chapter Ethical Characteristics, did there not seem to lie in the phrase a pretention of moral perfection which, though a good thing to aim at, is not modest to assume on this side of the millennium.  Co-operators are not desirous of being classed among the goody good people, who, as a rule, are not good for much.  What co-operators stand up for and profess, is a manly honesty in contracts, statements, and trade.  Their principles of co-operation imply not only good-will, but as we have said, fair participation of benefits with all who join them, and they, as a rule, keep the contract.  In statements, or profession, they, in the main, say what they mean and mean what they say.  In trade they can be trusted for genuineness in commodities, as far as care can compass it.  Justness of weight or measure are within every honest man's power.  Excellence of material and workmanship in articles of manufacture are their constant aim.  This is good every day trade morality, as trade goes, and better than a good deal that is known to go, under the system of irresponsible competition.  In its earliest days co-operators believed that honesty would pay, when not many persons in business did believe it.  They accepted the Latin maxim: "There is no expediency without honesty."

    This Jubilee History, which is now drawing to a close, does not include everything pertinent to it, from fear of its being too long for its purpose, which purpose is that it shall be read, and not weary the reader.  It is better to hear it said the book might be longer, than that the reader should say it had been better had it been shorter.

    The reader may find incidental repetitions, which if they do not chafe, are serviceable, inasmuch as they save him from going back for references.  Repetitions maybe tiresome, but obscurity is irritating.  However, setting the same things in new lights, is not repetition, but illustration and confirmation.  In a narrative of this kind the main thing is authenticity, to secure which no pains have been spared.  It is far easier to write fiction than history.  Verification of facts takes time and labour.  Hours may be spent in searching for a date, which when found, adds only two or three figures to the page.  Their presence lends confidence to the history, though there is very little to show for it.  In fiction the author can invent his facts, in history he has to find them.  Of things unsaid it will occur to some, that mention might have been made in the chapter on the town of Derby, that Mr. Herbert Spencer, who has long stood in the first rank of great thinkers, was the son of a Derby school teacher, and who lately made important co-operative suggestions.

    Among the curiosities of the "Early Records," the subject of an earlier chapter, there are other instances than those cited.  Here is one.  At a committee meeting on April 18th, 1865, it was gravely resolved—"That no order be given to any traveller in his presence."  How can an order be given to anyone out of his presence?  Where is he when he is not present?  An order may be sent to him but cannot be given to him, unless he is present to receive it.  But when the centenary of the Derby Society comes to be written, fifty years hence, historians of that day will find a mine of peculiarities in the minute books, and will thank us for our consideration in having left so much for their recital.

    Though there is no evidence that the carpenters and joiners of George Yard, knew much, if anything, of Robert Owen, those who afterwards carried the store movement forward did.  Robert Owen had been a frequent visitor to Derby, being an intimate friend of the Strutt family.   He had also addressed audiences in the town.  On one occasion he called on Mrs. Hagen, the Quakeress, of whom mention has been made.  Seeing a portrait of himself on the wall, he asked her if she knew Robert Owen.  Turning to the picture and then to her visitor, she said in her quick way, "Why, thou art Robert Owen."   The principles which the great Apostle of Social Ideas in England inculcated, and which became the characteristics of the Derby Society, were few and clear.  They were these:—

1.  Truth in speech, without which nobody will believe us.
2.  Honesty in transaction, without which custom in our stores cannot be retained.
3.  Unity by fraternity, without which no unity is real.
4.  Equity in according the gain everywhere among those whose diligence and vigilance help to produce it.

    It has been by these principles and the beneficial results which have flowed from their application, which so many have shared, that the Derby Society has won its 14,000 members.  In one of Shakspere's most suggestive passages he says:—

"Each in his own hand bears
 The means to cancel his captivity."

    The Derby Society, by bearing aloft, for half a century, the standard of co-operation, has caused the humblest member to know that he carries within himself the golden "means" of social extrication.  Each can, at will, cancel industrial captivity, if he has self-help in his hands and self-reliance in mind.  Independence and betterment of social condition lie that way.

    In the early part of the last century industry was one vast mist, often submerged by an obscuring sea of hopelessness.  At the close of this century, at least three headlands stand out—Rochdale, Leeds, and Derby Co-operative Societies, each with half a century of durability, and others, as at Hebden Bridge, showing that dry land is appearing where labour may take refuge and live.  It is the diffusion of intelligence which has wrought the great change, by making co-operation possible.  So long as men thought there was nothing in knowledge, there was no progress.  The Derby Society has been fortunate in its members, else it had never attained its present ascendancy.  Yet, in every society in the land its committee of management could have done twice as much as they have, had its members been twice as wise as they were.  Co-operation is in its infancy.  All pioneers are retarded by persons who do not see far before them.  A man who thinks he knows everything does not know that all about him know he does not.  Such persons forget that, while they may appear wise to those who know less than themselves, and pass for intelligent among those who know no more than themselves, they can never conceal their ignorance from those who are better informed.  No art can hide poverty of mind, but by means of education every man can enrich himself at will, and every person needs to be rich in knowledge who expects to make his way successfully through the world.  The pioneers of Full Street had night-bird eyes, for they foresaw the Albert Street Stores, altogether invisible to compeers of their day.

    Who has depicted the value of education to co-operators and others as Huxley has done?  Let the reader pause for a moment over his brilliant and burning words.

    "Suppose," he says, "that it were perfectly certain that the life and fortune of every one of us would, one day or other, depend upon his winning or losing a game at chess.  Don't you think that we should all consider it to be a primary duty to learn at least the names and the moves of the pieces; to have a notion of a gambit, and a keen eye for all the means of giving and getting out of check?  Do you not think that we should look with a disapprobation amounting to scorn, upon the father who allowed his son, or the State which allowed its members, to grow up without knowing a pawn from a knight?

    "Yet it is a very plain and elementary truth, that the life, the fortune, and the happiness of every one of us, and, more or less, of those who are connected with us, do depend upon our knowing something of the rules of a game infinitely more difficult than chess.  It is a game which has been played for untold ages, every man and woman of us being one of the two players in a game of his or her own.  The chess board is the world, the pieces are the phenomena of the universe, the rules of the game are what we call the laws of Nature.  The player on the other side is hidden from us.  We know that his play is always fair, just, and patient.  But also we know, to our cost, that he never overlooks a mistake, or makes the smallest allowance for ignorance.  To the man who plays well, the highest stakes are paid, with that sort of overflowing generosity with which the strong shows delight in strength.  And one who plays ill is checkmated, without haste, but without remorse." [9]   The education the society is interested in is not only the education of the citizen, important as that is, but the education of the co-operator in the essential principles he professes and endeavours to extend.  "A man is ignorant," says Bishop Tenison, "whatever he may know who does not know that which he ought to know and professes to know."  The Derby Society will always have honour for its endeavour to impart this knowledge to its members.

    But there is no reason to linger longer over incidents and principles that have intrinsic instruction in them.  A writer, like a speaker, should know when to give over.  A laboured peroration adds nothing to the force of a speech or the dignity of a narrative, and may efface its impression.  John Stuart Mill tells us that "eventually we may, through the co-operative principle, see our way to a change in society, which would combine the freedom and independence of the individual with the moral, intellectual, and economical advantages of aggregate production."  Already co-operation, like electricity, has become a new power in the commercial world, irradiating the paths which lead to the commonwealth of co-operative labour—the radiant land of Equity, where Justice is not blind, but seeing and protective.



    Co-operation may be likened to the Derwent, which flows noiselessly but unceasingly through the fields of industry, fertilising the banks made bare and barren by arid and impoverishing competition.

    Therefore, at this jubilee time we may say in the words (changing only one) of William Morris, who devoted his art, his wealth, his genius, and his poesy to accomplish similar ends of human betterance—

Come then, let us cast off doubting and put by ease and rest,
    For the cause alone is worthy till the good days bring the best.
Ah! come, cast off all doubting, for this at least we know,
    That the dawn of the day is coming, and forth the banners go.



    Of the History of the Society, written by Mr. G. J. Holyoake, assisted by Mr. A. Scotton, 14,000 copies are being printed, and 14,000 teapots are being made at Brownfield's Pottery, Stoke-on-Trent, one of which, with a copy of the History, we propose to present to each member.

    The Co-operative Wholesale Society have promised to send a large Jubilee Cake, which will be exhibited in one of the shop windows in Albert Street, and afterwards given away.

    It is also intended to give the Penny Bank children a treat, during July, and to present each one with a medal.



8.    The copy in the Free Library was published in 1791, and is now 109 years old.
9.    Huxley's Essay on "A Liberal Education."

118, C



[Home] [Up] [Autobiography] [Rochdale Pioneers] [Leeds Co-op Jubilee] [Co-operation] [Bygones] [Public Speaking] [Among the Americans] [The Reasoner] [Miscellaneous] [Site Search] [Main Index]