The
London Monthly Magazine
July, 1841.
John Critchley Prince, a weaver and a poet, gives the following
description of a night passed in a workhouse. He had been to
the continent to obtain work, but having found none, he had returned to
England. "The first night after his arrival he had applied for food
and shelter at a workhouse in Kent, and was thrust into a miserable
garret, with the roof sloping to the floor, where he was incarcerated with
twelve others, eight men and four women, chiefly Irish, the lame, the halt
and the blind. Some had bad legs, which emitted a horrible stench;
some were in a high state of fever, and were raving for drink, which was
denied them; For the door was locked, and those outside, like the bare
walls within, were deaf to their cries. Weary and way-worn, he lay down on
the only vacant place amid this mass of misery, in a sleeping chamber for
the unfortunate child of woe, the hapless vagrant in Christian England, at
the back of an old woman who appeared to be in a dying state; but he could
get no rest for the groans of the wretched around him; and the crawling
vermin, which, quitting his companions, crept up and down his limbs,
exciting in him the most horrible loathing. Joyfully did he indeed
hail the first beam of the morning that broke through the crannies of this
chamber of famine and disease; and when the keeper came to let him out,
his bed-fellow was dead—had quitted her mortal coil, unshriven, unpitied,
and unknown!"
――――♦――――
SKETCH OF THE AUTHOR'S LIFE.
(Extracted from a Provincial Periodical.)
JOHN CRITCHLEY PRINCE
is a native of Wigan, in Lancashire, and was born on the 21st of June,
1808. His father was a reed-maker for weavers, and having a family
of several children, and but a precarious business to depend upon, was
unable to send his son, the subject of our sketch, to school. His
mother, however, an intelligent and industrious woman gave the best
example and instruction in her power to her children; and to her maternal
solicitude the youthful poet is indebted for what he acquired of correct
principles wherewith to begin the world. Prevented by poverty from
procuring him instruction in a day school, she sought to obtain this
advantage in the Sabbath School of a Baptist chapel in the neighbourhood,
where he gained a very imperfect knowledge of reading and writing.
His strong natural love of inquiry, however, prompted him to an
extraordinary application of the limited means thus afforded to him of
seeking information from books; so that, almost as soon as his attainment
was equal to the reading of a sentence, he used every leisure moment to
practise and improve it, by poring over such stray volumes as he was able
to procure.
At the early age of nine years he was put to learn his
father's trade, at which tedious employment he was compelled to work from
fourteen to sixteen hours per day. Every indication of a love of books was
sought to be repressed by his father, when, to gratify the ardent longings
of his spirit for reading, he was betrayed by the passion into stealing a
moment from the severe duties of his employment to engage in the forbidden
pursuit. There is no doubt that these adverse circumstances may have
repressed the full development of his poetic genius, but that strong
principle of his nature, poverty, want, and punishment, were unable to
exterminate. A mind skilled in tracing moral effects to their
causes, might, perhaps, be able to prove that the strong love of freedom
which so nobly characterises the poet's compositions, was, in a large
measure, developed by the harsh treatment to which, in his early youth he
was subjected; and that the ardent love of Nature, which breathes through
his strains, was heightened by contrasting the gay and joyous life of the
inhabitants of woods and wilds, and the harmony and beauty of trees,
streams, and flowers, with the unrelieved and still recurring toil of his
own occupation, carried on in the poverty-stricken chamber,—
" Where the pale artist plies his sickly trade." |
All the adverse circumstances that surrounded him were unable to "freeze
up the genial current of his soul;" the passion was intense, and would be
gratified. When the family had retired to rest, full oft would young
Prince, at the witching hour of night, leave his bed, and with furtive
steps and slow, creep down stairs, and by the dim light of the "slacked
fire," revel in the charms of "Robinson Crusoe," or the horrible and
mysterious grandeur of Ann Radcliffe and Monk Lewis. The native longings
of his heart found a rich banquet in the wild and wondrous of these tales;
and the beautiful descriptions of natural scenery which give such a charm
to the "Mysteries of Udolpho," and the free scope for inventive genius in
Defoe's "Shipwrecked Mariner," fed the enthusiasm of the embryo bard, and
made him sigh to visit foreign lands, and meet with "moving incidents by
flood and field."
Distress and embarrassment compelled his father, in 1821, to
leave Wigan and proceed to Manchester, in search of employment, when he
took our young friend, then thirteen years of age, with him. After a time
they obtained employment with the eminent machinists of Manchester,
Messrs. Sharp and Roberts, then of Toll. lane, Deansgate. They remained
here but a short time, leaving for Stockport, and shortly after came back
to Manchester, and were again employed by the respectable firm before
mentioned.
It was about this time that young Prince first obtained a
copy of the works of Byron, which he read with the most intense and
rapturous delight. His mind had now met with its natural aliment; the
strains of the noble poet awoke a kindred response in the breast of the
obscure and humble boy; who from that moment became a worshipper at the
fane of the Muses. To confirm the bent, he became acquainted, at this
time, and formed an endearing intimacy with an old German, who had been
wounded at Waterloo. He had seen much of the world, and was, withal, of a
well-cultured and communicative disposition; and in their summer evening
rambles, he stimulated the warm enthusiasm of his young companion, by the
wild and mysterious legends of his fatherland, and nourished in him the
germs of poesy with those overwrought colourings of the excited fancy,
with which the exile loves to paint the fondly remembered scenes of his
native soil.
Pecuniary difficulties once more compelled the father to quit
Manchester, and take up his abode at Hyde, a village about eight miles
from thence. Here young Prince dragged on a miserable sort of life, made
so by a combination of circumstances which it is not necessary here to
explain. In the hope of making a happier home to himself, he entered into
the matrimonial state with a pretty and interesting young woman of his own
rank of life, a "neebor lassie" of Hyde, in the latter end of 1826, or
beginning of 1827, when he was yet under nineteen years of age. He had not
at this time acquired the necessary proficiency in his trade, and he had
still to work for his father. Under these circumstances his income was
extremely limited, and when offspring began to come, the joint endeavours
of both parents were barely sufficient to procure the necessaries of life. Things dragged on thus heavily until 1830, when his hopes were excited by
the statements put forth of the want of English artizans in France, and
those of his craft especially. He thereupon set off for St. Quentin, in Picardy, leaving his wife, to provide, by her labour, for his three
children and herself, until he should procure employment, and such a
remuneration for it as he had been led to expect. When he arrived in
London, he heard of the Revolution in Paris, and the flight of Charles X. Not reflecting on the necessary stagnation which this must occasion in
manufactures, he determined that, having proceeded so far, he would
venture onwards. Arrived at Calais, he had to remain some days, until news
was brought that Louis Philippe was elected King of the French. He now
proceeded up the country to St. Quentin. Here he was doomed to
disappointment: the revolution had paralyzed every thing;—business was at
a stand still, and no employment for him was to be had. He knew not now
what to do; whether to return home, his hopes frustrated, and money
wasted, or to proceed to the great seat of manufactures, Mulhausen, on the
Upper Rhine. He chose the latter course, and accordingly wended his way thitherwards, by the way of Paris, where he staid eight days, during which
time he visited the Theatres, the Church of Notre Dame, Pere la Chaise,
the Palais Royal, the Luxemburg, the Thuilleries, and the Gallery of the
Louvre,—ascended the column in the Place Vendome, and viewed other
"lions" of the French metropolis, till at length finding his viaticum—so
small at the beginning—dwindling to a most diminutive bulk, he proceeded
forward through the province of Champagne, to his destination.
On arriving at Mulhausen, he found trade little better than
at St. Quentin. Many manufactories were shut up, and the people in great
distress. His means were completely exhausted. In a land of strangers, and
entirely ignorant of their language, with the exception of the few words
he had picked up on the road, he was indeed forlorn. Without the means to
return, and in the hope of a revival in trade, he remained here five
months in a state of comparative starvation; sometimes being two entire
days without food. During this time some trifling relief was afforded him
by the generous kindness of Mr. Andrew Kechlin, a manufacturer, the mayor
of the town.
Finding that his hopes were fruitless, and the desire of
again seeing his wife and children becoming insupportable, he at length
determined to undertake the task of walking home, through a strange land,
for many hundred miles, without a guide, and without money. Accordingly in
the middle of a severe winter, (January, 1831,) with an ill furnished
knapsack on his back, and ten sous in his pocket, he set off from
Mulhausen to return to Hyde, in Lancashire, with a heart light as the
treasure in his exchequer. His wants, his privations damped not the ardour
of his soul; his poetic enthusiasm, while it drove him into those
difficulties which a more prudent and less sanguine temperament would have
made him avoid, yet served to sustain the buoyancy of his spirits under
the troubles which environed him, and which it had superinduced.
For a few days he kept along the beautiful and romantic banks
of the Rhine, exploring its ruined castles, and visiting every scene of
legendary lore that came in his path, exclaiming, in the words of his
favourite poet, Goldsmith,—
"Creation's heir, the world, the world, is mine!" |
He journeyed through Strasburg, and admired its splendid cathedral;
through Nancy, Verdun, Rheims, Luneville, Chalons, and most of the
principal cities, &c., that lay near his route, till he reached Calais
once more; obtained from the British Consul a passage across the channel,
and again set his foot on his native soil.
During his toilsome journey he subsisted on the charity of a
few English residents, whom he found on his way. He lay in four different
hospitals for the night, but not once in the open air, as he did
afterwards in his own country. The first night after his arrival, he
applied for food and shelter at a workhouse in Kent, and was thrust into a
miserable garret, with the roof sloping to the floor, where he was
incarcerated along with twelve others—eight men and four women, chiefly
Irish—the lame, the halt, and the blind. Some were in a high state of
fever, and were raving for drink, which was denied to them; for the door
was locked, and those outside, like the bare walls within, were deaf to
their cries. Weary and way-worn, he lay down on the only vacant place amid
this mass of misery, at the back of an old woman, who appeared to be in a
dying state; but he could get no rest for the groans of the wretched
around him. Joyfully did he, indeed, hail the first beam of morning that
broke through the crannies of this chamber of famine and disease; and when
the keeper came to let him out, his bed-fellow was dead!
Released from this lazar house, he proceeded onward,
pennyless and shoeless towards London, begging in the day time, and lying
in the open fields at night. When he reached London he had been the whole
day without food. To allay the dreadful—but to him then
familiar—cravings of hunger, he went to Rag Fair, and taking off his
waistcoat, sold it for eight-pence, he then bought a penny loaf to
mitigate his hunger, and four-pennyworth of writing-paper, with which he
entered a tavern, and, calling for a pint of porter, proceeded to the
writing of as much of his own poetry as his paper would contain, and this
amid the riot and noise of a number of coal-beavers and others.
As soon as he had done his task he went round to a number of
booksellers, hoping to sell his manuscript for a shilling or two, but the
hope was vain. The appearance and manners of the famishing bard, to these
mercantile men, were against him—he could not succeed in finding a
customer for his poetry, or sympathy for his feelings.
He stayed in London during two days, wandering by day, foodless, through its magnificent and well-fraught streets, and pacing about
or lying on the cold stones in gateways, or on the bare steps of the
affluent by night. In despair on the third day, he left the metropolis of
the land of his birth, where he was a greater stranger, and less cared for
than in a foreign land, and wended his way homeward, first applying for
relief to the overseer of "merry Islington," where, urged by the stings of
famine, he was importunate, when denied assistance, and was, therefore,
for his temerity, thrust into the streets to starve. A youthful and unabused constitution, however, saved him from what might have befallen a
less healthful frame, and a less buoyant heart.
At length, by untiring perseverance, he reached Hyde, having
slept by the way in barns, vagrant offices, under hay stacks, and in
miserable lodging-houses, with ballad-singers, match-sellers, and
mendicants, fully realizing the adage of Shakespear, that "misery makes a
man acquainted with strange bed fellows." On his route from London, he
ground corn at Birmingham, sung ballads at Leicester, lay under the trees
at Sherwood Forest, near Nottingham, lodged in a vagrant office at Derby,
made his bivouac at Bakewell, in Derbyshire, in a "lock up," and finally
reached Hyde, but found, alas ! it contained for him a home no longer.
Whilst poverty had thus brought suffering upon him, when in
quest of better means to provide for his family, it had also brought woe
and privation upon his wife and babes. Unable to provide for her children
by her labour, she had been compelled to apply for parish aid, and was, in
consequence, removed to the poor house of Wigan. After a night's rest,
Prince hurried off to that town, and brought them back to Manchester,
where he took a garret, without food and clothes, or furniture of any
description. On a bundle of straw did this wretched family, consisting of
a man and his wife and three children, lay for several months.
During all this time Mr. Prince was unable, but at very long
intervals, to obtain very insufficiently rewarded employment; and had it
not been for the labour of his wife, who is a power loom weaver, and
withal a most industrious and striving woman, they would have starved
outright. At this period of privation, their youngest child died.
During this series of years, he has written his poetry at all
times and under all circumstances. The gratification of this passion was
always a source of enjoyment, and enabled him to revel in pleasure in an
ideal, even when misery was nipping him keenly in the real world. At
different times he has contributed to the Manchester newspapers, and to
three of its local periodicals—the Microscope, the Phœnix,
and the Companion, all of which latter are now immured in "the tomb
of the Capulets."
It is pleasing to observe that Mr. Prince's poetry is little
touched with that spirit of repining misanthropy, or harsh hatred of those
superior to him, which has too frequently characterised the effusions of
several other poets of the suffering poor. There is gracefulness in the
expression, and a musical flow in the language, which mark the suavity of
the poet's temperament. Nor would a stranger to the man infer that his
polished lines were the outpourings of a self-educated artizan, who had
given them birth amid scenes of the most dire distress, or under the
prostrating influence of fatigue, surrounded by the anti-poetical smells
of oil and steam, and the rumbling clatter of wheels and machinery in a
cotton-mill. Yet under these adverse circumstances have some of the most
beautiful of his compositions been conceived, and noted down at meal times
and after the labour of the day.
Mr. Prince is of a retiring character; and no one would
imagine, from a slight acquaintance with him, that he had seen much of the
world, much less that he had wandered in foreign lands, and drank so
deeply of the bowl of misery. He seems to have passed through these
varieties of human condition rather as an observing wayfarer, than as
participating therein. In a great measure, his ill success in the world is
fairly attributable to the want of confidence in himself, and of that
becoming assurance, without which, however great a man's talent, or
sterling merit, the path to advancement is not in his way.
――――♦――――
RANDOM THOUGHTS ON POETRY.
THE subject I have chosen whereon to make a few
random remarks, may, perhaps, be considered as one of minor importance,
compared with the large practical utility of general science, or the more
abstruse, but not less interesting, study of social and political economy:
nevertheless, it is a subject with which I have formed a slight
acquaintance, and one to which I have been long and ardently attached.
I shall not speak of this "dainty Ariel of the mind" in the technical and
almost unintelligible jargon of the critics; but in the language of one
who loves it for its delightful and never-to-be forgotten associations,
and for the influence it has in soothing the heart and refining the human
mind.
Poetry, and the things which superinduce poetical thoughts
and feelings, are co-existent and co-eternal with the Universe itself.
When the Almighty, in the plenitude of his wisdom, created the Earth, the
plan and progress of his work was the opening, and the gradual
development, of a poem which no inferior Intelligence should ever be able
to alter, imitate, or destroy; a poem of transcendent grandeur and
sublimity, which should never become obsolete, but retain its pristine
loveliness to the very end of time.
In the beginning the Spirit of God moved in the realm of
Chaos; and this wondrous world, fair in its aspect, and vast in its
proportions, rose from the dark and mysterious abyss. He said, "Let
there be light," and the young sun sprang forth on his ethereal way, never
to rest again. The clouds, brightening in his smile, followed after
him, to decorate the heavens, and fructify the earth. The chaste and
quiet Moon made her first journey up the steep of night, while her
attendant stars, mingling in a maize of intricate but perfect harmony,
rang with the music of according spheres. He spake again, and the
waters were gathered together into seas, leaving the dry land filled with
the germs of beauty and abundance. Every valley was mantled with
delicious verdure, and every mountain with the waving majesty of woods.
The silent earth lay beneath the smile of heaven, like an unbounded
Paradise, where herb and leaf, bud and blossom, flower and fruit, grew
spontaneously together ; making a spot so formed for peace and love, that
angels afterwards came down to hallow it with their divine presence.
Again the Invisible spake, and countless myriads of creatures
started into active life. The mighty leviathan gambolled in the
great deep; the lordly lion and colossal elephant, yet harmless in their
strength, startled the forest solitudes with cries; the graceful antelope
and bounding fawn scoured the luxuriant vales; and cattle of each kind
answered each other from a thousand hills. Birds, radiant in plumage
and prodigal of song, waved in the light of heaven innumerable wings, and
filled the vocal air with sounds of freedom, melody and joy. Again
the fiat of the Eternal went forth, and Man—proud, complicated Man—erect
and in the image of his Maker, rose up from his native dust, the last and
crowning ornament of Creation. Behold, then, the object of Divine
Wisdom accomplished,— the glory of Divine Power made known, and the
everlasting Poem of Nature completed.
After a time, man acquired the faculty of speech, or the art
of communicating to his fellow-beings, by oral sounds, his wants, his
wishes, feelings, and ideas. Melted into sorrow, cheered into
gladness, or warmed into enthusiasm by the surrounding circumstances of
his existence, he gave utterance to more than ordinary language, and that
language was—Poetry. Love for woman, affection for offspring, esteem
for a friend, triumph over an enemy, and devotion to the Deity, were the
first and natural subjects of his rhapsodies. At length, men
appeared more largely endowed with the higher powers of the mind, more
thoroughly imbued with the love of Nature, and more deeply skilled in the
secret workings of the human heart. They raised themselves by the
strength and beauty of their inspirations, to a place pre-eminently above
the rest of mankind; poured out their whole souls in poetry, and
transmitted to future generations the splendid and imperishable emanations
of their genius.
The first effusion we have on record, containing all the
characteristics of true poetry, is the Song of Moses. Indeed, the
whole of that sublime and extraordinary book—the Bible, is enriched with a
thousand inimitable specimens of this divine art. The fervent and
devotional tenderness of David, the minstrel King of Israel,—the pastoral
sweetness of Solomon,—the prophetic grandeur of Isaiah,—the pathetic
lamentations of Jeremiah,—the majestic diction and sublime imagery of Job,
have seldom been equalled, and never surpassed by any of the Poets of
ancient or modern times.
It is almost impossible to take too extended a view of the
nature and character of Poetry. All the strange vicissitudes of
human life,—all the harmonious beauty of the Universe,—all the
incomprehensible sublimity of the Supreme Being is Poetry, in the widest
and most significant sense of the word. Whatever excites our wonder
and admiration, awakes our best sympathies, and stirs up the hidden depths
of our passions, is Poetry; inasmuch as it brings into exercise the moral
and intellectual faculties of the mind. Nature is the grand Temple
of Poetry, and that man who hath received the celestial fire of
inspiration, is the chosen High Priest of her rites. He expounds her
sacred mysteries; he points out her ineffable beauties. In fancy his
feet are planted from mountain to mountain; his face is lifted towards
heaven; he opens his mouth, and in the language of angels, he moves,
raises, and refines myriads of human hearts. He is all eye, all ear,
and almost all soul; for the strong wing of his imagination soars through
the uttermost regions of Time and Space,—pierces the veil of Eternity, and
even attempts to penetrate into the holy sanctuary of the Invisible
himself.
Poetry is cultivated and brought out under many forms and
names. The Philosopher cultivates it by discovering and making known
the sublime facts and wonders of creation and of human nature: the
Moralist, by extolling the loveliness of truth, and pointing out the
efficacy of virtue in alleviating the ills of life: the Patriot, by
fostering a love of country and kindred, and speaking with enthusiasm of
the blessings of freedom in every land: the Musician, by awakening the
spirit of melody, and giving an audible voice to every passion that sways
the human breast: the Sculptor, by creating from the cold and shapeless
marble, forms of life-like vigour, majesty, and grace; the Painter, by
transferring to his canvass the hues and features of external nature, the
visions of imagination, and the strange and stirring events of the dreamy
past: the Poet, by sending his soul abroad to revel in the universe, and
clothing his inspired thoughts in language lovely as the earth, and
lasting as the sun in heaven.
It is true that the greater portion of the people, the poor
and uneducated, can neither understand nor appreciate the higher
principles of Poetry; but while they can be cheered by a simple air, and
melted by a pathetic ballad,—while they have joys and griefs, hopes and
fears, feelings and affections, in common with all mankind, they cannot be
said to be entirely unmoved by its influence. The spirit of poetry
is within them, and only requires the quickening breath of moral and
mental culture to give it a more permanent and elevated character. I
think that a day will come, and I look forward to it with the cheerfulness
of constant hope, when the sayings and sentiments, beauties and truths, of
the masterminds of every age and clime, shall become "familiar as
household words;"—when the Poet shall be looked up to as a being sent by
Providence for a special and benevolent purpose, as the favoured
interpreter of all that is good and true, all that is lovely and sublime,
all that is wonderful and harmonious in universal things;—when he shall be
loved and revered while living, honoured and mourned when dead, and his
name enshrined in the hearts and memories of myriads of his
fellow-creatures.
It is almost impossible to imagine a more exalted character
than that of a man possessed of great mental powers and indomitable moral
courage;—a man dignified in manners, winning and eloquent in speech,
prompt and decisive in action; a man just, brave, benevolent, pure, and
serenely virtuous; in private, gentle and affectionate as a child,—in
public, upright and awful as a sage. But, if in addition to these
rare qualities, he were gifted with a Poet's inspiration—that holy fire
which gives light to thought, and warmth to feeling—his pre-eminence would
be greater still. Above all, if he had the will to devote his
God-like energies to the good of his fellow-men, his existence would be a
blessing and a benefit to the age in which he lived, and his name a beacon
of glory to succeeding generations. A few such mighty spirits would
effectually regenerate the human race, and raise it to a state of
perfection "little lower than the angels." It is gratifying to
believe—and this is a faith from which I cannot willingly swerve—that such
men will rise up in after times, whose purifying powers shall banish from
the earth selfishness, superstition, ignorance, and crime; and make their
fellow-mortals more worthy of the beautiful world in which it has pleased
God to place them.
It is a lamentable fact—and one that almost appears an
anomaly in nature—that the divine gift of Poesy has been made subservient
to the basest of purposes; by pandering to licentious
passions,—promulgating dangerous doctrines, and giving false and distorted
views to men and things.
One sad perversion of this great gift—thanks to reason and
truth—is now becoming obsolete, namely, the practice of singing in praise
of war and the wine-cup;—flinging the halo of Poesy over two of the
greatest evils that ever afflicted humanity; exalting rapine, revenge, and
wholesale slaughter as the noblest object of man's pursuit, and raising
their most successful followers to a place among the demi-gods; holding up
drunkenness and debauchery as things worthy of imitation; and making them
the supreme sources of enjoyment. It is, however, consoling to know
that a few Master-Spirits of the Lyre have soared above these ignoble
themes, and vindicated the high character of the Muse, by singing as men
to men capable of every virtue here, and born for immortality hereafter.
The Song of Milton is deathless as the subject upon which it is built; the
ethereal verse of Shelly will continue to rise in estimation while there
is beauty and truth in the world; the simplicity, sympathy, and philosophy
of Wordsworth will take a permanent place in the literature of his own
age, and keep it for ages to come; and Shakspeare, in whom all the rest
are blended,—Shakspeare, the Poet of the Universe,—shall follow the
footsteps of Time, and only cease to be remembered when our language is
forgotten.
To many these "Random Thoughts" may appear false and
extravagant; but, as I do not dogmatically assert them to be correct, I
may, at least, be allowed to flatter myself with the hope that they are
so. My enthusiastic love of Poesy may have led me to view it through
a too highly-coloured medium; for I cannot express how much I have been
indebted to poetry, as a source of intellectual enjoyment, during years of
many sorrows, many baffled hopes, and many vain endeavours to rise above
the evils of my condition. Yes; Poetry has been the star of my
adoration, affording me a serene and steady light through the darkest
portion of my existence;—a flower of exquisite beauty and perfume,
blooming amid a wilderness of weeds,—a fountain of never-failing
freshness, gushing forth in an arid desert,—a strain of witching and ever
varying melody, which so softens my heart with sympathy, and strengthens
my heart with fortitude, that I bless God for having made me susceptible
of feelings so elevating, so humanizing, so divine.
――――♦――――
Fraser's Magazine
A Lancashire Poets' Corner,
by
J. A. Noble.
THE Poets' Corner at Westminster is known to all the
world as one of the sacred places of historic renown—as the repository of
the dust of men whose living remains are among our most precious
possessions, and must ever remain the theme of our proudest boasts.
The Poets' Corner in Lancashire had little venerableness, less fame, and
hardly any beauty, and yet it possessed certain features of interest which
render it worthy of remembrance by those to whom the humblest forms of
literature have a peculiar charm. It was not a transept in a
world-famed abbey, but a little public house situated in Millgate,
Manchester—a narrow, ugly, unpoetic street at the back of the Cheetham
College, and not far from the parish church, which has since its day of
fame been made the cathedral of the diocese. It was a low, old, and,
in its way, picturesque-looking building, with an aspect which carried the
mind at least a couple of hundred years into the past. Those who
have seen Shakespeare's house at Stratford-on-Avon, and can imagine it set
down in the busiest part of a Lancashire manufacturing centre, will have a
better idea of the appearance presented by the little tavern than could be
given by any elaborated architectural description. It had not always
been known as the Poets' Corner, for it possessed a flaming sign on which
appeared the likeness of a human face contained in a circle, from the
circumference of which spread out a number of spokes or rays—a design
which, as every one knows is recognized as a correct likeness of the sun
whenever that luminary has to do duty on a signboard. The Sun Inn
was accordingly for many years the name of the little hostelry; and that
name it would probably have retained had it not, some time before the year
1842, passed into the hands of a certain Mr. William Earnshaw, who, being
a man with some literary tastes, conceived the happy idea of making it a
meeting-place for the poetic souls who at that time mustered in good
numbers in and around Manchester. Earnshaw had been a small
manufacturer somewhere—where I know not—but things had not gone well with
him, and he had accepted a situation on the staff of the Manchester
Examiner, not then the influential organ it has since become. He
took the old-fashioned inn; had the legend, the "Poets' Corner," inscribed
over the narrow doorway; and felt a pride in gathering round him the
choice spirits of the pen, the sock, and the buskin, the first being in
the majority, and the poets being among them the principal "stars."
Earnshaw had not only a natural taste for the things of the mind, but a
fair amount of cultivation; and his wife was a singularly superior woman,
who seemed out of place as a dispenser of beer, even to customers of
bardic inspiration. The Poets' Corner could not have been described,
even in an advertisement where a little license is allowed, as a house
doing a roaring business; for, with the exception of its regular artistic
frequenters, hardly any one ever entered it; and if a stranger, attracted
by the old-world look of the place, had crossed the threshold, it would
probably have puzzled good Mrs. Earnshaw how to treat or where to put him.
The poets, however, knew where to put the arts of emotional
expression to which life owes so much of its beauty and charm. I say
one or more of the arts, because, as I have already hinted, the haunters
of the Poets' Corner were not exclusively men of verse. Artistic
power or appreciation of any kind was a passport of admission to this
select circle; and though there were few painters and no sculptors among
the company in the old-fashioned parlour, the professors of a sister art,
members of the regular company of the Theatre Royal and occasional
wandering histrionic stars, were numerous and welcome visitors to this
Lancashire Parnassus. The actors were most of them good
talkers—better talkers as a rule than the poets, some of the latter
seeming as if they had made a vow to keep all their intellectual jewels
concealed from view until they could be fairly secured by a setting of
type. This, of course, was not the real explanation of the
comparative conversational barrenness of the poets of the Corner.
Most of them were by nature meditative men; and, to such, expression comes
most quickly in solitude, and most slowly in a talking throng. It is
perhaps unfair to expect a fine poet to be also a fine talker; it is
against the analogies of nature. More than once or twice in
literature has the poet been compared to the lark, and, as Alexander Smith
says, "the lark is not always singing, no more is the poet." Harry
Bedford was one of the loungers at the Corner, but I remember that he and
his vivacious and artistic acting were frequent subjects of panegyric
whenever dramatic criticism was the order of the evening. One of his
best characters was that of Bob Cratchit in a dramatized version of
Dickens's "Christmas Carol," which was almost as popular as the story
itself; though the play proved an unfortunate one for the lessee of the
Royal, as it was on the night of its performance that the theatre was
burnt down. I am not sure whether Bedford ever appeared again in
Manchester; if not, there is no doubt that he was missed. He was a
fine-natured fellow, of infinite wit, and when he died in Dublin he left
behind a number of very sincere mourners.
It must not be supposed that the poets were mere dummies, who
did nothing but sit, and drink, and smoke, and look intellectual. In
fact they did not look particularly intellectual; for, so far as personal
appearance went, the bards of the Corner were by no means an extraordinary
or striking set of men. There were, however, some of them whose very
silence had an impressiveness of its own, and even the silentest had his
flashes of eloquence, or humour, or rough satire, while three or four were
unmistakably good talkers, who would from almost any company have carried
away the conversational palm. Prominent among these was John Bolton
Rogerson, author of "Rhyme, Romance, and Reverie," or, as he chose to
spell it, "revery," a volume of both prose and verse; "A Voice from the
Town" (poetry); and a third volume, which I never saw, the name of which
has slipped from my memory.
MANCHESTER.
From the Poetical Works of the late
John Bolton Rogerson.
And this, then, is the place where Romans trod,
Where the stern soldier revell'd in his camp,
Where naked Britons fix'd their wild abode,
And lawless Saxons paced with warlike tramp.
Gone is the castle, which old legends tell
The cruel knight once kept in barbarous state,
Till bold Sir Launcelot struck upon the bell,
Fierce Tarquin slew, and oped the captive's gate.
No trace is left of the invading Dane,
Or the arm'd followers of the Norman Knight;
Gone is the dwelling of the Saxon thane,
And lord and baron with their feudal might;
The ancient Irwell holds his course alone,
And washes still Mancunium's base of stone.
Where once the forest-tree uprear'd its head,
The chimney casts its smoke-wreath to the skies,
And o'er the land are massive structures spread,
Where loud and fast the mighty engine plies;
Swift whirls the polish'd steel in mazy bound,
Clamourous confusion stuns the deafen'd ear,
The man-made monsters urge their ceaseless round,
Startling strange eyes with wild amaze and fear;
And here amid the tumult and the din,
His daily toil pursues the pallid slave,
Taxing his youthful strength and skill to win
The food for labour, and an early grave:
To many a haggard wretch the clanging bell,
That call'd him forth at morn, hath been a knell.
But lovely ladies smile, in rich array,
Fearing the free breath of the fragrant air,
Nor think of those whose lives are worn away
In sickening toil, to deck their beauty rare;
And all around are scatter'd lofty piles,
Where Commerce heapeth high its costly stores—
The various produce of a hundred isles,
In alter'd guise, abroad the merchant pours.
Learning and Science have their pillar'd domes;
Religion to its sacred temples calls;
Music and Art have each their fostering homes,
And Charity hath bless'd and sheltering halls;
Nor is there wanting, 'mid the busy throng,
The tuneful murmurings of the poet's song. |
At the time when he was a frequenter of
the Corner he held the post of editor of the Oddfellows' Magazine,
so that he might be considered a professional man of letters. He
had, in his day, pursued many callings. He had once been a
bookseller; then we hear of him as an actor; then taste and circumstance
conspired to force him into authorship; and, lastly, he became the
registrar of a Manchester cemetery, where he died and, I suppose, was
buried. He was, on the whole, the most attractive and fascinating
man in the little circle. In person and in manner he was singularly
graceful; and, unlike some of his brother poets, impressed strangers at
once as being a man of real cultivation, which, indeed, he was. He
was not only a full man, but a ready one, and seemed never at a loss for
facts, or thoughts, or fancies to add to the discussion of any theme which
supplied the question of the hour to the poetic forum.
Among the few artists who occasionally put in an appearance
and contributed to the stream of talk was a certain George Liddell.
He had no special idiosyncrasies, no angles of character on which
reminiscences can be hung; but old haunters of the Poets' Corner remember
him gratefully in connection with a picture of the exterior of their
beloved rendezvous, afterwards engraved, which gives a very accurate
impression of the old-fashioned inn. What became of Liddell I do not
know; but it is hardly likely that he achieved either fame or fortune by
his art, for his most marked characteristic was a genial, happy, careless
indolence, and he was only too ready, like the plumbers in Mr. Dudley
Warner's delightful book, "My Summer in a Garden," to leave anything in
particular for the sake of a chat about things in general. He did
little, but he enjoyed much, and was a source of enjoyment in others; for,
in spite of didactic moralists, the melancholy fact remains that the
useful member of society has not half the popularity of the jovial
ne'er-do-weel.
Elijah Ridings, whose various verses now lie before me in a good-sized
but not very artistic-looking volume entitled "The Village Muse," had none
of the external features which we are accustomed to associate with the
typical poet; indeed, if the truth must be told, he bore a much stronger
resemblance to a rural butcher. He was a big, burly man with a rubicund
face, the colour of which displayed an increasing tendency to concentrate
itself in the most prominent feature—a testimony to his appreciation of
the flowing bowl which was not unjustified by the facts. Of immoderate
drinking, as the phrase was then understood, there was not much at these
nightly congresses; but there was a good deal of what may be described as
very thorough-going conviviality, and several of our poets undoubtedly
shortened their days by lengthening their potations. Ridings could
indulge more freely than the majority of his poetic comrades without
seeming much the worse for it, and it must be admitted that he did not
hide this special talent in a napkin. His voice was in harmony with his
appearance—a loud, thunderous, overpowering organ; and when he overrode
the ordinary hum of talk with what Rogerson in his principal poem
describes as "sage remarks on bards of old," no one could choose but
listen. "Bards of old" is perhaps a poetical license, for Ridings's
poetical affections did not stray further into the past than the age of
Elizabeth. Shakespeare and Byron were his two prime favourites; and, as the
latter was the god of his enthusiastic idolatry, the fact that his poems
contain comparatively few and unimportant traces of Byronic influence says
something for the individuality and spontaneousness of his verse. Ridings
was for a time the bell-man at Newton Heath, a rural district not far from
Manchester, but he afterwards took a bookstall in the busy thoroughfare
of Shudehill; and there, surrounded by the beloved silent friends with
whom he delighted to hold converse night and day, he probably died. He
was still bell-ringing in 1842, and on March 24 in that year the poetic
brotherhood held a sort of symposium. Various poems, nineteen in all,
were contributed for the occasion, and were afterwards collected in a
small volume, or rather pamphlet, entitled "The Festive Wreath," copies
of which are now rare, and are much prized by local collectors. One of
these poems was a somewhat rollicking ditty from the pen of Alexander
Wilson, one of three brothers who were the joint authors of a collection
of verse called "Songs of the Wilsons;" and the second stanza has a
mention of Elijah Ridings which recalls very vividly the personality of
the burly and jovial poet.
The Sun is a school, where the wit or the fool
May improve him by rule, both by night and
by morn;
Lit up by a Bamford, the Radical gaslight,
Whose flame will shed lustre on ages unborn.
There's Elijah the bellman, who, self-taught
and well, man,
I'm happy to tell, man, hath courted the muse;
He'll quote and recite far a day and a night,
man,
From Tim Bobbin, or Shakespeare, at "owd
Bobby Booth's." |
The Bamford, for whose gaslight such enduring brilliance is here
predicted, was Samuel Bamford, well known in his own neighbourhood as the
author of "Hours in the Bowers" and another volume of verse, and over a
more extended area as the writer of an intensely fascinating autobiography
entitled "Passages in the Life of a Radical." Bamford had always a certain
air of power and distinction; he was six feet or more in height,
well-built and well-proportioned, and when in old age his long beard
became perfectly white he presented an imposingly, venerable appearance. At the time of which I am writing, however, he could not be called old,
though he had crowded into his years an experience of action and passion
which might have made him feel like a centenarian. He had been present at
the great meeting held on August 16, 1819, in St. Peter's Field,
Manchester, to petition for reform in Parliament—the meeting which was
the scene of the notorious Peterloo massacre—and he had been imprisoned
for two years on a charge of treason. This fact and the name of his book
render it unnecessary to add that Bamford was on the side of the
people—the side not only of glory but of danger, of both of which he had
his share. The danger he probably enjoyed for the sake of the excitement;
but for glory of any kind, at any rate for literary glory, he seemed to
have a measure of contempt. In the flourishing days of the Poets' Corner
Bamford was residing at Middleton, a village about four miles from
Manchester, and was making a fair livelihood by hawking his own books,
which he sold at about ten or twelve shillings each. Some one—I think it
was one of his less successful brother poets—suggested that for Bamford
to constitute himself his own bookseller was not exactly respectable;
that it was rather derogatory from the true dignity of a poet; and that it
might, moreover, interfere with his fame. But Bamford was proof against
this appeal to the last infirmity of noble minds, and replied brusquely,
"Dash the fame!" (the original word was stronger than dash,
but dash is
near enough); "don't talk to me about fame; I take care of the bread and
cheese, and let the fame take care of itself." Bamford could feel the
force of the proverb concerning a bird in the hand, to say nothing of the
fable of the dog and the shadow; and perhaps had a shrewd idea that while
the bread and cheese were fairly certain, the posthumous honour which
Wilson had predicted for him was hardly to be depended upon. If this were
so, events have proved that he was not mistaken. "Hours in the Bowers"
are forgotten hours for all but a few Lancashire men who are interested in
every scrap of the literature of their county; and, from all that I can
hear, even the Radical autobiography has few readers, though it is well
worth reading as a most interesting contribution to the history of England
in the first quarter of
the nineteenth century. Bamford was a Bohemian to the backbone. Lord
Francis Egerton, who had a genuine love of literature and a generous
sympathy with literary men, got for him a place in Somerset House; but the
atmosphere of officialism did not agree with the doughty Radical, so he
returned to Lancashire to earn his bread and cheese by following his own
bookselling devices.
Alexander Wilson, the author of the lines quoted above, was, as I have
said, a member of a vocal family, and the small volume "Songs of the
Wilsons" contains a fair number of really good specimens of dialect verse.
In a biographical account of the Wilsons prefixed to the songs, I find an
amusing and characteristic anecdote which is perhaps worthy of
reproduction. One of the family, named William, happened, somehow or
other, not to be a poet. He was in fact a mute, inglorious Wilson; but,
though he never wrote a song, he had a capital voice, and could sing with
wonderful effect the lays of his kinsfolk. Being once in a party of six at
an inn in Manchester he was astounded by the impudence of a man named
Macfarlane, who, after singing the song, the "Countryman's Description of
the Collegiate Church," written by Thomas Wilson, another of the brothers,
coolly claimed the authorship for himself. William Wilson was able at once
to establish the falsehood of this claim; and one of the company,
determined that the impostor should be thoroughly annihilated, made a bet
with Macfarlane that he could not even write a verse, and that William
Wilson could. This was hard on William as well as on Macfarlane, for he
had left poetry to his brothers and had never strung together a couple of
rhymes in his life; but the honour of the family as well as his friend's
money was at stake, and he soon produced the following veritable
impromptu:—
Six jolly fellows in the castle met,
To smoke their pipes and drink their heavy wet;
When one arose and wished them all to know it,
That he himself was really born — a poet. |
This was not absolutely a great effort, but it was too great for poor Mr.
Macfarlane. He tried and tried and tried again, but he was fairly beaten
and had to drown his discomfiture in glasses round. His victor reposed
upon his laurels, and never dimmed his suddenly won reputation by the
composition of another verse.
Alexander Wilson, the frequenter of the Poets' Corner, was the youngest
son of the family, and was not only a poet but a self-taught painter—a
humble follower of Hogarth, Wilkie, and the realistic humorists and
humanists. His most important pictorial work was entitled "The Manchester
Rush-cart," and into it he introduced very recognizable portraits of local
celebrities, the most prominent object in the picture being the rush-cart
itself, which is shown standing opposite the Manchester Arms Inn in Long Millgate while morris-dancers, fighting women, pickpockets, and pigs
contribute to the life and movement of the work. The picture excited a
good deal of interest, and was ultimately disposed of in a raffle for
sixty guineas—a price which proves that the artist had won, for an
amateur, a good local reputation. It was, however, as a song-writer and a
boon companion that Alick Wilson, as he was always called, was
distinguished at the Poets' Corner. He was a mercurial little fellow,
brimming over with animal spirits, and not without a fair share of vanity,
which rendered him the butt of tolerably frequent good-tempered banter. On
one occasion Mr. John Dickinson, a Manchester bookbinder, who was among
the regular frequenters of the Corner, addressing Alick at a pretty full
meeting of the Parnassians, congratulated him on having been seen lately
in very distinguished company. Wilson assumed an amusing air of
self-satisfaction and pleaded for particulars; but Dickinson withheld them
until the poet's curiosity was strained to the fullest extent, when the
revelation was made that the distinguished company had consisted of
certain notorious aristocratic local roués, and that the place of meeting
had been one of the most fashionable, but also one of the most
disreputable, resorts in Manchester. The poet was very angry for a moment,
for he saw at once that his weakness had been played upon by a fabricated
story, but he was compelled at last to join in the laughter which greeted
his discomfiture. Conversational horse-play of this kind was not perhaps
very elevating, but it was human; and even favourites of the Muses cannot
always be talking of Shakespeare and the musical glasses. It is certain
that, on the whole, the talk of the somewhat rough-hewn Lancashire poets
would have compared favourably with much of the conversation in
metropolitan literary circles of far higher pretensions; for it was always
sincere, generally vigorous, and occasionally felicitous with that
felicity which comes not of the study of professional phrase-makers, but
of the spontaneous activity of original minds. Poor Alick Wilson was not a
long liver, for he died in 1846, at the early age of forty-three; and
Ridings, whose praises he had sung in life, wrote an epitaph, which is engraved on his tombstone in the Cheetham Hill Cemetery:—
Thy strains have charm'd the evening hours
With inoffensive glee;
And
they who knew thy varied powers
May well remember thee.
While wit and humour are admired,
Thy quaint and cheerful rhymes,
By truest genius inspired,
Will brighten future times. |
The epitaph came in my way; but it is unfair to quote such thin and
commonplace lines without a protest against their being taken as a sample
of Ridings's best, or even of his average, work. They are, however, an
illustration of a weakness which the Manchester school of poets shared
with other poetical cliques—a provoking habit of indulging in perpetual
and public mutual admiration. The members of it were a little too fond of
predicting immortality for each other, without considering carefully
enough whether there were sufficient grounds for these complimentary
prophecies. Ridings eulogizes Critchley Prince; Critchley Prince eulogizes
Ridings; Wilson and Rogerson eulogize everybody—one in flowing rhymes,
the other in rather wooden blank verse; and others of the circle whose
volumes are not at hand to refer to were equally given to scattering
panegyric round the country in a painfully reckless manner. For this
weakness, however, they can hardly with fairness be accounted personally
responsible. They lived at a time when it was a literary fashion to talk
about the poet as an altogether exceptional and extraordinary specimen of
humanity; to regard the ability to run together a few rhyming lines about
the beauty of nature, or the glories of liberty, or the delights of love,
as a sure sign of "Heaven-sent inspiration;" and Lancashire working-men
who had—and who knew that they had—genuine poetic instincts might well be
excused for applying to each other exaggerations of language which were
sanctioned by some of the most influential of contemporary literary
authorities.
One of the names just mentioned was more widely known than that of any
other of the poetic brotherhood. No casual visitor to the Poets' Corner
could fail to notice a dark-complexioned, delicate, fragile-looking man,
with a finely moulded head, who drank slowly but steadily, and said
little, but whose dark eyes, which gleamed through the glasses of a
constantly-worn pair of spectacles, seemed the eyes of a man who might
have much to say. The indication was deceptive, for the owner of them,
John Critchley Prince, was among the silent singers. Never was there a man
of genius— and genius Prince undoubtedly possessed— whose conversation
gave less evidence of his powers. He had travelled much both in England
and on the Continent in search of work; had passed through the most varied
and exciting experiences; had read as many books as he could get hold of;
and yet, as an intimate friend of his observed, "he seemed to know
nothing." He was, in fact, a man whose expressional gift was purely
literary; whose avenues of utterance were opened by a pen, an ink-bottle,
and a sheet of paper, but closed by the presence of even the most
congenial associate. His prose has a certain freedom and mastery which we
are accustomed to associate with a greater amount of culture than fell to
poor Prince's lot; and much of his verse possesses the true lyrical charm,
which in the work of many poets of the people atones so splendidly for the
absence of that artistic craftsmanship which we are wont to call
classical. Prince was well acquainted with privation: he had known what it
was to sell the clothes from his back in order to allay the pangs of
hunger; but, as soon as his earliest verses were published, he obtained
abundant recognition both in Lancashire and the metropolis, and certainly
could never be described as a neglected poet. If, however, the world did
not neglect him, he neglected himself; for he was one of that numerous
class who are, as the popular saying has it, no one's enemies but their
own. A craving for alcohol, natural or acquired, blighted his life and
hastened his death. A wealthy admirer of his verse, who had often
befriended him, offered to pay him two pounds weekly so long as he
abstained from intoxicating drinks, and for some time the pension was
fairly earned and duly received; but Prince found it impossible to carry
out his part of the contract, and the two pounds was given up that he
might return to his favourite liquor—rum. He did not drink much at a time—indeed he probably could not; but, to use the expressive words of an
occasional visitor at the Corner, "he was always at it." At last he became
so entirely dependent upon artificial stimulus that he could not rise from
bed in the morning without a dram, and when this point was reached the end
was not far distant. He had not the constitution of his friend Ridings;
when the breaking-up came it was a rapid one, and his death brought to a
sad and early close a warped and ineffectual career. The value of his
accomplished work I do not attempt to estimate; for this is a sketch, not
a criticism. It was loudly praised by contemporary writers of repute, and
probably over-praised; for there is no gentle critic who will not err, if
he err at all, on the kindly side in dealing with the simple, heart-felt
utterances of a poet known to be as heavily handicapped as was poor
Prince; but, after all deductions are made, it may, I think, be declared
that he had the true "vision and faculty divine," and no small measure of
the "accomplishment of verse."
Another life, even more wantonly wasted than Prince's, was that of
Robert Rose, known as the "Bard of Colour." He was a finely-made,
full-blooded negro, of whose early history I know nothing; but at the time
when he was one of the poets of the Corner, he was a man of wealth—or of
what seemed wealth to his poorer comrades—and lived in a good house in
Salford. He was a quick, vivacious fellow, with the inborn gaiety of his
race, very companionable and thoroughly hospitable. He was fond of asking
his friends to breakfast with him; and those who received an invitation
for the first time, and asked at what hour they must put in an appearance,
were somewhat startled at being informed that it was Mr. Rose's habit to
take his first meal at three or four o'clock in the afternoon. Of course
this meant that he did not retire to rest until the small hours were
growing into large ones, and this turning of day into night was
symptomatic of his whole life. He was a restless soul with a passion for
adventure, and his favourite recreation was to run over to Liverpool and
take a trip to sea in one of the pilot-boats belonging to that port. He
contemplated embodying the imaginative results of these excursions in a
poem the length of "Paradise Lost," which was to be entitled "Ocean
Mysteries;" but before the mysteries of the ocean were grappled with he
was suddenly brought face to face with a greater mystery still. After a
presumably heavier drinking-bout than usual, he was picked up insensible
in the street and carried to the lock-up, where, with no friendly hand to
receive a farewell pressure or to close his eyes, the Bard of Colour
breathed his last.
Many unforgotten faces rise before one, and many names seem to claim at
least a mention; but, for the time, the record as it stands must needs
suffice. Of the men who were at all prominent members of the bardic
coterie I know of only one survivor, Mr. R. W. Procter, who in those
"days of story and song" was a little, bashful man, full of shyness yet by
no means devoid of sociability, still on the whole an observer rather than
a talker. He ought, indeed, if in his composition the general fitness of
things had been observed, to have been a brisk and ready
conversationalist; for he was by trade a barber, and published a volume of
very bright and readable sketches entitled "The Barber's Shop," to say
nothing of a number of poems given to the world under cover of the
pen-name of "Sylvan." I believe he still follows his humble but useful
vocation somewhere in Old Millgate, and has of late years gained a new
title to the gratitude of his fellow-citizens by a large work on the
"Streets of Manchester," full of curious information, the harvest of long
and loving research among the archives and traditions of one of the most
venerable of our great centres. He remains, but his companions have
departed. They have joined those more illustrious singers who slumber in
that other Poets' Corner, and have gained that last and most enduring of
dignities which is in the gift of King Death. The Poets' Corner in
Manchester will never attract the crowds who are drawn to the spot where
lie some of the great masters of English literature but so long as poetry
is precious, not merely to the cultured critics but to the careworn crowd,
not even the humblest shrine of simple song deserves to be altogether
forgotten.
――――♦――――
Autumn Leaves
from
The Examiner (1857)
WE have not seen a little book entitled
Autumn Leaves, by J. C. Prince, but we have seen in the columns of
a contemporary a few verses quoted from it, with this statement, which
forms its preface:
"The author of the following miscellaneous poems has
nothing to say in their favour. They have been published in
the hope that they may afford him some means of gaining a humble
livelihood. His own trade, that of reed-making always
uncertain and fluctuating, has latterly been much depressed, and is
not at all to be depended on. These are his chief motives for
publication. The author hopes that the critics will, in
consideration of these circumstances, be indulgent to his very
imperfect effusions."
|
The stanzas we have seen are good enough to make us wish that
the poor reed-maker may with his own "pastoral reed" win of the world more
than he can earn by his mere work-a-day manner of dealing with the grass
that has so long been sacred to the muses. One of the stanzas runs
as follows:
"How beautiful is nature, and how kind
In every season, every mood and dress,
To him who woos her with an earnest mind,
Quick to perceive and love her loveliness.
With what a delicate, yet almighty stress,
She stills the stormy passions of the soul,
Subdues their tossings with a sweet control,
Till each spent wave grows gradually less,
And settles into calm! The worlding may
Disdain her, but to me, whate'er the grief,
Whate'er the anger, lingering in my breast,
Or pain of baffled hope,—she brings relief;
Scares the wild harpy-brood of cares away,
And to my troubled heart serenely whispers
'Rest.' " |
Nature has done her part, but man can also do something
towards bringing about the more perfect fulfilment of the last two lines
in that tranquil strain of verse.
――――♦――――
OPINIONS OF THE PRESS.
[Appended to the "The Poetic Rosary"—Ed.]
Mr. Prince is one of those men, so rare, yet so welcome when
they come, who, born and educated amid poverty, and invested with a quick
intellect, have, amid the gloom of their world, such an expansion of
heart, that when they condemn, they condemn without bitterness. In
the entire range of literary history we have read of no poet with a mind
more elastic than that possessed by Prince. His mind rebounds from
the passions and the degradation with which he has been unavoidably
associated, and the rebound has been both signal and lofty. Apart
from birth and education, and in the completeness and individuality of the
word, J. C. Prince is a poet. He has an intuitive perception of the
finest beauties of life, and a quick comprehension of the beauties of
nature. We need not say more. We have written only what is
generally admitted; but our desire is that Mr. Prince's works should be
the companions of every poor man, because they will increase his social
tendencies; and further, we wish them to be in the possession of every
rich man, because they will teach him that a Poet of the People is not
necessarily antagonistic to the wealthy.—The Critic (April, 1847).
One of the chief merits of his productions lies in their
being so faithful a transcript of the feelings and sentiments cherished by
the class of men to which he belongs. His poems are one and all the
products of a sound and healthy mind, equally free from moody misanthropy
or pining discontent. His ill success in life has soured neither his
temper nor his verses. While pleading the rights of the poor, he
does not forget the respect due to those of the rich, and, accordingly, no
harsh hatred of those superior to him in station is to be found in his
pages. The regeneration for which he longs is perfectly compatible
with the permanence of existing institutions; and no man anathematises
more strongly than himself, the popular demagogues who, for the attainment
of their own lawless ends, would disturb the peace of society, and
remorselessly involve the nation in ruin and bloodshed.—Monthly
Magazine.
Here we have a volume of verses which, considering the
condition and opportunities of the poet, may be pronounced wonderful.
But, wherever or howsoever composed, his poems possess very considerable
merit, merely as poems, and laying aside altogether the circumstances
under which they have been produced. If the Muse "found him poor at
first, and kept him so," the measure of the divine gift he possesses has
brought its own delights and rewards; and, in the midst of poverty, he can
still wisely and piously bless God for "having made him susceptible of
feelings so elevating, so humanising, so divine."—Tait's Magazine.
Had such a volume of poetry as the one before us been
produced twenty years ago by a poor cotton weaver, its author would have
been accounted a prodigy. Mr. Prince's merits are enthusiasm,
earnestness, freshness of feeling, and a quiet power of painting bits of
scenery, and nature. His command over language is remarkable, and he
sometimes evinces great felicity of expression. It will be seen from
our extracts that he has caught a real spark from the great meteor of
Poesy, and we trust he will still solace his leisure hours with the Muses,
gaining his, meed of tribute and applause from his fellow men.—Westminster
Review.
It is greatly to the credit of Mr. Prince's heart, and the
divine art which he pursued with such enthusiasm, that poverty has had no
power to sour or corrupt his nature. His poems slow an innate
refinement of mind, and a sweet healthy tone of sensibility, together with
a pure and ennobling morality, which speak volumes in favour of the
author's head and heart.—Sun.
Having closed our extracts, we may express our estimation of
the author. If poetry may be defined as an intense love of the
beautiful, the right, and the true, then is Prince a poet in the noblest
sense of the word. All his thoughts, sentiments, and aspirations are in
the right direction. His poetry has a healthy, fresh tone, which must
reach the unsophisticated heart.—Manchester Guardian, (Second
Notice.)
In taking leave of this volume, we may say that, as an
appropriate gift to youth of either sex, we know few that can compare with
it in genuine poetry, blended with the highest moral feeling, and the
purest taste and sentiment. It is full of earnestness and sincerity,
and has many other good qualities which must make for it a path to favour,
wherever truth is valued, the best affections prized, and the moral
advancement of man desired.—Manchester Guardian, (third notice.)
Considering the many grave disadvantages with which the
author of this volume has had to contend, he must be accounted a poetic
genius of the highest order. There are an elasticity of thought, a
fruitfulness of imagination, and a high-toned generosity about everything
he writes, which must of necessity gain him troops of friends.—Manchester
Courier.
We are happy to say that these poems require no tenderness on
the score of circumstances, from the hand of a critic. They abound
with images of beauty and themes of rejoicing; and except when a pensive
thought breaks in upon him for a moment, there is scarcely a solitary
evidence of the pangs out of which all this sweet music is extracted.
We have sufficient cause to wonder that these poems possess so much
intrinsic beauty, and so much real weight of unadulterated truth.—Atlas.
It is wonderful that this man, after what he has suffered,
should still have the heart to write poetry—poetry gentle and beautiful
in sentiment, and graceful in composition. He is a man of
originality and genius. "Hours with the Muses," all things
considered, is a wonderful production. We see in it the evidence of
a great power, which, we hope and trust, will be worthily developed.—Sheffield
Independent.
Of all those whose names have risen as a bright star from the
low horizon of society, the author of "Hours with the Muses," is, in our
opinion, almost unequalled. We hate half praise when we have felt
whole pleasures; and certainly, our minds have never kindled with more
true fervour than while reading the poems of J. C. Prince. Most
warmly do we recommend this volume to the notice of our readers; we are
indeed in error if any one can read it without being better and wiser.
We hesitate not to predicate that the name of J. C. Prince can never die.—Midland Counties' Herald.
Mr. Prince is no ordinary man, and no ordinary poet.
His poetry is a marvel; its high finish, melodious rhythm, purity of
sentiment, and elegant diction, would do honour to any living poet.
We regard it as an honour to our age and country to have produced such a
man, and heartily recommend his volume to all lovers of true poetry.—Sheffield
Iris.
Mr. Prince's poetry is the natural expression of a mind
observing and thoughtful, and his mind has been prompted by his heart in
all its remarkable enterprises. His intellect has never left his
feelings in the background. There is always a drop of benevolence at
the bottom that sweetens the whole draught.—Leeds Times.
The poetry of J. C. Prince is of a free and flowing melody
and graceful expression. The "Poet's Sabbath" offers proof that the
writer has both a painter's hand and a poet's heart. All his
sentiments, as represented by his poetry, do him great credit.—Athenæum.
Mr. Prince's poetry is of a high and sterling class. It
is full of imaginative beauty, and of a delicate and pure diction.
But what is even more admirable than the poetry itself, are the sound
sense and the true philosophy which distinguish it. All his
unmerited sufferings have not embittered his nature, nor distorted his
reason; he calls upon his fellows to liberate themselves, but warns them
against the destructive delusions of physical force. He points out
in peaceful language the real enemies of the working man; he advocates at
once both political and domestic reform. Mr. Prince has only to hold
on, to be a prince amongst poets, and a blessing to the meritorious but
suffering masses of this country.—WILLIAM HOWITT. _______________
Favourable notices have also appeared in The Spectator, The
Metropolitan, The Church of England Magazine, The Christian Teacher, The
Manchester Times, The Manchester Advertiser, The Leeds Intelligencer, The
Liverpool Albion, The Liverpool Mercury, Chambers' Journal, Bradshaw's
Journal, The New York Herald, The New York Tribune, Channing's American
Magazine, and others.
――――♦――――
SUMMARY
of the life of
John Critchley Prince.
____________
Compiled by Stuart Smith,
great, great grandson of Critchley Prince's sister, Sarah.
Born. |
Wigan
21.6.1808. All books show his birth as 21st June but Baptismal
Record for Wigan All Saints shows 20th June with baptism on 9th May
1813. |
Married. |
1826 to
Ann Orme who died September 1858. Remarried 1862 to Ann Taylor. |
Occupation. |
By trade
Critchley Prince was a Reedmaker in the spinning industry. His
father and brother followed the same trade. |
Died. |
Hyde
5.5.1866. Buried St Georges Church Hyde 10.5.1866. |
PARENTS
AND SIBLINGS. |
Father. |
Joseph
Prince b. 21.10.1787. m. 1.2.1807. d. 1854. Father's parents
were John Prince and Elizabeth Batkin; the family originated from
Yoxall, Staffs. |
Mother. |
Nancy
Critchley b.17.8.1789. m. 1.2.1807 d.? His mother's parents were
Robert Critchley and Phoebe Finch; the family originated from Wigan. |
Brother. |
James b.
17.3.1820, d. 12.5.1864. James married:
1. Caroline Cheetham in 1844 and
2. Harriet and had three children, a son Thomas and two daughters Alline
and Annie. |
Sister. |
Sarah b.
28.3.1828, d. ?, Sarah married William Oldham and had four children,
Joseph Prince Oldham, Alfred Oldham, Charles Oldham and Nancy Prince
Oldham. |
Sister. |
Elizabeth
born Wigan 24.2.1813. Elizabeth married Joseph Catlow. |
Sister. |
Mary b.
24.11.1817. m. 11.3.1839. d. 2.1.1909. Mary married John Marsden.
|
? |
One
further sibling for whom there are no details. |
JOHN
CRITCHLEY PRINCE'S FAMILY. |
Marriage. |
Married
in 1826 (or early 1827) to Ann Orme. Following Ann's death in 1858,
on 30th March 1862 Critchley Prince remarried, to Ann Taylor
(b. 1814). |
Ann Orme |
Born
8.3.1805, christened on 28.4.1805 at St Michaels Church Ashton Under
Lyne. Parents were William and Ann Orme. Ann died in 1858. |
Children. |
Three
children by his first wife Anne Orme: a daughter Elizabeth b.
20.2.1828, m. Charles Hall 30.2.1849, d. ?; a son b. 182? d. 1832; a
daughter b. 182? d. 1855. Prince's youngest daughter married
and had a son and a daughter. The son died prior to 1858; the
daughter was looked after by Elizabeth the elder daughter of John C.
Prince). |
JOHN
CRITCHLEY PRINCE. |
1808. |
Born at
Wigan 21.6.1808. Christened at Ebeneezer Methodist New Connexion
Chapel, Bolton Le Moors, on 11.7.1808. |
1812
(ca.). |
Attended
Sunday School at a local Baptist Chapel in Wigan. |
1818. |
Apprenticed to his father in the trade of reed maker (worked 14 to
16 hour days). |
1821. |
Removed
to Manchester; employed by Sharp-Roberts at Todd Lane, Deansgate. |
1823. |
Removed
to Hyde with family. |
1826. |
Married
to Anne Orme. |
1828. |
Daughter
Elizabeth born 20.2.1828; christened at Denton 20.4.1828. |
? |
Son born. |
1830. |
Left for
France to find work. See description of travels in France in “Life
of John Critchley Prince” |
1831. |
Returned
from France to Hyde to find wife and children in the Wigan
Poorhouse. Removed to Long Millgate Manchester. At this time
(according to “Life”) Critchley Prince had three children. |
1832
(ca). |
Death of
youngest child, a son. Removed to Hyde and again worked with father
as a reedmaker. |
1836. |
Formed an
association with some other persons in Hyde known as the “Literary
Twelve” who met in each others' houses in rotation. |
1838. |
Employed as a Yarn
Warehouseman by Randall Hibbert of Hyde. |
1839. |
A contributor “The
Regenerator”, a weekly journal; in one issue is referred to as the
“Bard of Hyde”. |
1840. |
Removed to 15 Long
Millgate, Manchester, with wife and two daughters (located between
Cheetham College and the Grammar School, and opposite the “Sun Inn”
in Hanging Ditch). Opened shop selling stationery, etc. |
1841. |
First (of six) edition
of “Hours With The Muses” published
in July. Became a founder member and secretary of the “Literary
Association”. Charles Dickens subscribes to “Hours With the
Muses” (letter to John Critchley Prince from Charles Dickens dated
31st March 1841 - “The Letters of Charles Dickens”, Pilgrim Edition,
Vol. 2, 1974) |
1842. |
Contributed to the
“Oddfellows’ Magazine and, in a competition dated the 13th August
1842, was awarded a prize valued at £6 for poetry, his entry being
published in the October 1842 edition. On October 15th he
received a £50 grant from Sir Robert Peel. Lord Leigh wrote a
letter to Sir Robert Peel in the hope of obtaining some form of
employment (Sir Robert Peel replied in a
letter dated 15th October,
1842). Eldest Daughter Elizabeth attended a small school run
by a Miss G. Varley (later Mrs G. Linnaeus Banks, author of “The
Manchester Man” 1876). Removed to 82 Hanover Street,
Manchester, having given up the shop at Long Millgate.
Returned to work as a reedmaker. During this year Critchley
Prince was offered, and turned down, employment in the Post Office
at Southampton as either a postman or as a sorter. |
1843. |
Removed to Hodgson
Street, Ashton, and later to Stamford Street near New Church, Ashton
Under Lyne (letter dated 10th December from this address).
Eldest daughter lost her new bible at New Church Ashton Under Lyne
on 10th December 1843. Met and corresponded with Charles
Dickens (“The Letters Of Charles Dickens”, Pilgrim Edition,
Vol. 3, 1974). During this year worked as a reedmaker for a Mr
Moorhouse; also travelled to Blackburn in search of employment
staying for a few weeks. |
1844. |
Removed to Henry Street,
Ashton Under Lyme. Appointed editor of “The Ancient Shepherds
Quarterly” at a salary of £12 per year. |
1846. |
A number of gentlemen
from Ashton formed a committee to collect benefit subscriptions.
This continued for a few years, but eventually ceased when, due to
Critchley Prince's drinking and unreliability, several of them
somewhat lost patience with him. During this time he left his trade
as a reedmaker to try to make arrangements to have another book
published. |
1847. |
“Dreams
and Realities” published. |
1848. |
Removed to Penny Meadow,
Ashton under Lyne (name appears in the “Poor Rates Book” of Ashton
Under Lyne in May 8th 1850 and 1851 on a dwelling in Penny Meadow as
“Excused Rates due to abject poverty”). |
1850. |
Living at Catherine
Street, Ashton. In a letter to a friend he states that 1250
copies of his last book “Dreams and Realities” had been sold.
He wrote “But I have been sadly fleeced by the publishers. I
received £5 for this work. Had I the means of printing myself
I could have made £50.” “Poetic Rosary”
published in September 1850, and dedicated to Charles Dickens (with
Charles Dickens' permission, but correspondence with Dickens
concerning is not extant). |
1851. |
Removed to Dale Street,
Ashton under Lyne. 1851 Census shows as living at 30
Wellington Road, Ashton Under Lyne. At some time during this year
was also at 2 Bradgate, Ashton. |
1852. |
Was living at Dale
Street, Ashton and working as a reedmaker. At some time
travelled to Blackburn to work for a Mr David Carruthers, living
there at 34 Bent Street; at Fleming Square; and later lodging with a
Mr Henry Liversedge at Anvil Street. |
1853. |
Possibly still working in
Blackburn. |
1854. |
Death of father, Joseph
Prince. Late in 1854 was back in Ashton; moved to Hill Street
West, Ashton. Worked at Brook Street, Ashton with his brother
James in the business which had been founded by his father. |
1855. |
Returned to Blackburn
and, for 12 days, worked with a Mr Parkington, again lodging with Mr
Henry Liversedge at Anvil Street. Death of youngest daughter leaving
him and his wife with two grandchildren. Still working with
brother. |
1856. |
“Autumn
Leaves” published (book carries wording that it is being sold by
the author from Brook Street, Ashton). |
1857. |
Removed to 138 Charles
Street, Ashton. At this time his brother in law (husband of
sister Sarah Prince) states that his income was 5/- per week.
(Vicar of St Peters Church Ashton, on the authority of Lord Leigh
and other admirers, donates a weekly sum of 5/- and coals.) (See
“Poorhouse Fugitives”, Brain Maidment, 1992 Edition, pages 342-4,
correspondence between J. C. Prince and his printer G. Booth, which
gives an indication of his financial position). |
1858. |
Death of wife Ann Prince
(née Orme) due to an 'accident'.
Following Ann’s funeral returns to Hyde and moves in with his
mother, Nancy. Surviving daughter (Elizabeth, m. to Charles
Hall) moves to Sheffield taking his surviving grandchild (the
daughter of Prince's youngest daughter) with her. Short period
of time spent at Blackburn living with a Mr John Harwood. |
1859. |
At a meeting at Newton is
introduced to a Mr Tetlow and his wife and unmarried sister, Ann
Taylor, who subsequently becomes second wife. |
1859-61. |
Lived in Hyde, Blackburn,
and Newton. 1861 Census also shows Prince living with his mother,
Nancy Prince, at Brook Street, Hyde. Received several
contributions from the Royal literary Fund, the last one in
September, 1860. |
1861. |
Prince's final
collection, “Miscellaneous Poems”, is
published, being dedicated to his publisher, John Heywood.
2000 copies of “Miscellaneous Poems” are sold by his brother in law,
Mr William Oldham. Prince's health begins to fail. |
1862. |
Remarried to Ann Taylor
on 30th March 1862 at St Mary’s Church, Mottram in Longdendale.
Marriage certificate shows John Prince as aged 53, Widower,
Reedmaker, Father Joseph Prince Dd. Reedmaker. Ann
Taylor is shown as aged 48, Spinster, Tenter. Father's name
given as Jonathan Taylor Dd. Witnesses are Jonathan Hindle and
Joseph Bradley. |
1863. |
Living at Brook St.,
Hyde. Health deteriorates further with an attack of paralysis
(stroke?). |
1864. |
In letter dated 10th May
states “Yesterday one of family died” and that his brother is
expected to die any day soon from consumption. Does not state
who had died, but his brother's son, Thomas, died in May, 1864.
Prince's brother James was to die on the 12th May, 1864. |
1866. |
Dies at Hyde on 5th May
1866 and is buried on 10th May at St George's Church, Hyde (west
side of church to South West of Steeple). A subscription is
made by friends to erect a monument on Prince's grave. Details of
the inscriptions on the monument appear, funeral, etc. in “Life". |
1881. |
Prince's widow, Ann, is
shown in the 1881 Census (aged 69) living at 2 White Hart Street,
Newton, with her sister Mary Tetlow. |
1908. |
Centenary Exhibition held
at Wigan Library |
1909. |
Surviving sister, Mary
Marsden, dies on 2.1.1909 |
1966. |
Programme of readings
from J. C. Prince's works given to celebrate 100th Anniversary of
his death. |
SOURCES. |
“Life of John Critchley Prince”, R A D Lithgow, 1880, Abel Heywood.
“Poems by J C Prince”. Two Volumes, Edited by R A D Lithgow, 1880.
Abel Heywood.
“Encyclopedia of National Biography”.
“Hours With the Muses” John Critchley Prince, 1841.
“Dreams and Realities” John Critchley Prince, 1847.
“The Poetic Rosary” John Critchley Prince, 1850.
“Autumn Leaves” John Critchley Prince, 1856.
“Miscellaneous Poems” John Critchley Prince, 1861.
“Lancashire Characters and Places”, Thomas Newbigging, 1891.
“The Poorhouse Fugitives” Brian Maidment, 1987, Carcanet Press (ISBN
0 85635 970 X.)
Census Records. Hyde 1841 1851. 1861. 1881.
Baptismal Records. Hyde.
Marriage Records. Hyde.
“Letters Of Charles Dickens”, Pilgrim Edition. Vols. 2 & 3.
“Memorials of Bygone Manchester”, R. W. Procter, 1880, Palmer &
Howe.
“Lancashire Authors”, J. R. Swann, 1924.
“Poets, Poems and Rhymes of East Cheshire”, Thomas Middleton, 1908.
|
|