THOMAS HOOD, POET AND PUNSTER.

BY

GERALD MASSEY.

DOES the reader believe in the truth of the doctrine promulgated by Dr Gall, that the brain is the seat of the mind, and that it may be mapped out into divisions and organs for our manipulation?  For myself, I am perfectly convinced of the general truth of phrenology, although I may doubt the particular truth of many phrenologists.  And it seems to me that in this bust of Hood published with his poems, and said to be correct, one can account for his peculiarities and define his genius.

    Nature has written out all great characters and strong individualities in unmistakeable relief against the smooth surface of her nonentities.  She throws them into relief, so to speak, for manipulation, like letters cut to be read for the blind.  What every man is, is traced on this map of thought, and whatsoever he does in the heart, is proclaimed on the house-top.  Mr Tennyson went incog., with a friend, to a phrenologist.  He was unknown to him, and kept silent.  The phrenologist was not a man of great attainments, but it did not take him long to write out Mr Tennyson's head as one of the finest he had ever seen, and of the grandest poetic type.  Even so may we read those Greek and Roman heads at the Crystal Palace where the casts are correct, for the Greek artists were exquisite phrenologists—not that they knew anything of brain-theories, but because they copied nature so closely, and because the characters they represent are absolutely striking in the manifestation of their qualities.  The anatomy of modern art does not include conformation of brain, hence we see the most ludicrous things:— bloodthirsty warriors with not destructiveness enough to kill a mouse; affection without benevolence; saints without veneration; and heads of children only made to be exhibited for monstrosities.  A smattering of physiognomy sufficeth them.

    But let us look over the head of Thomas Hood, and see whence Poesy leapt, followed by many merry-dancing, wicked-witted sprites, playful quips, and oddities.  The first thing that strikes us in this noble round-head, is the diaphanous look of the face, and the smallness of the regions devoted to the sense of life and gusto of enjoyment.  There is no revel in physical health which overflow s in what we term humour; for humour is as much the outcome of a healthy animalism and a strong ruddy nature, as it is of peculiar conformation of brain.  In this sense Hood has the mind but lacks the body of humour.

    But there is another ingredient of humour of which Hood has little—it is hope.  His hope is small.  This would sadden his nature, continually check its buoyancy, and for ever prevent it reaching the reckless joviality and swimming in those floods of unctuous mirth which characterise other humorists.  His humour is not so much a rich feeling, as a dry thought.  He is like those who may not feel the pleasures of life, and so they think them.  He is also restricted in the imaginative region: his sense of sublimity (wonder) is a not large; his ideality is immense.  Here, again, he gains in thought and loses in feeling. Thus is he shut out of the broader fields that we reckon the domain of humour, and confined to the narrower range of wit—that is, wit as understood in our day.  Here he reigns supreme.  He is the most ethereal of wits.  He cannot be coarse, and savage, and disgusting, like Swift, because his impulses are so moral and so noble, his nature is so full of poetry.  He cannot be cruelly sarcastic because his secretiveness and destructiveness are so small.  In the midst of the most fleering ridicule, there is a smile of goodness and a twinkle of kindness.  It's a tender soul and a loving face behind the mocking mask.  Though his mind be swayed this way and that, like the flower in the stream, with tricksy tendencies, it always has a deep strong rootage of earnestness, and anchors fast in humanity.  He might have been hail-fellow-well-met with those rare fellows at the Mermaid Tavern, because of his brilliant parts, but the welcome over, he would have quietly shrunk into a corner.  But the little quiet man in black, lighting up at times, would have given them many delightsome surprises, and called forth their thunders of merriment with the lightning-flashes of his odd quips, humours subtle and grotesque, and sparkling repartee.  In his head the organs of wit, comparison, and casuality are very full; language is also large.  And they indicate precisely the prominent features of Hood's wit.  He is the greatest word-twister in the world.  He detects analogies in words and ideas with the rapidity of intuition.  He produces his most startling effects by antithesis—the sudden contrast and explosion of opposites.  And by virtue of his organisation he is just the personification of antithesis:—large wit and small hope—that means laughter next-door to tears; mirth with a mournful ring to it; merry fancies holding the pall of laughter, or letting its coffin gently into the grave; light gracefully fringing the skirts of darkness; life deftly masking the hiding place of death.

    A nature like his, even in moments of solemn agony, will often break out into bewildering freaks of farce, and make such genuine merriment, that the lookers-on may fail to see that the heart is breaking down in the tragic depths that lie below the sparkling surface.  Women at such times, not being able to possess their souls to the same stretch and strain, will burst into hysterical laughter, when they want to be weeping bitter tears.  Hood always appears to me to have so deep a sense, such a painful sense of the terrible earnestness of existence, that it would be unbearable if he could not get some humour out of it, and phantasie some light and merry moods of mind.  His wit is often set to this tune, but so perfect is his representation, that you do not see how thin is the partition which divides your laughter from his sorrows, and that is making fun of his own troubles, some of which are deep as death.  In the sunshine of spirit which he calls forth, he sets his tears as very jewels of wit.  Like Garrick, he can laugh on one side of the face and cry on the other; and some of his touches of mirth surprise you into tears.  In his 'Ode to Melancholy,' he sings—

    I have remarked that he produces his greatest effects by antithesis (indeed, that word is the sum of human life—the law of the universe —the history of file world.  God and the Devil—Good and Evil—Truth and Error—Man and Woman—Attraction and Repulsion, these are our sublimest illustrations (if antithesis); here are a few examples.  In the 'Song of the Shirt,' he tells us that the singer sat

And she cries,

What handwriting on the wall is this—

In the 'Dream of Eugene Aram,' he makes the murderer say of his victim—

And, speaking of the dead body, 

But, turning to a more cheerful subject, we shall find this antithesis come to a climax in the 'Parental Ode to my Son, three years and five months old.'  Here we have the prose and poetry of Childhood written in parallel lines, and startling but truthful contrast.  Unless the reader is accustomed to have to write against time, and the brightest strains of thought jangled by a child, or children, boisterously appealing to the parental anxiety, it will be difficult to reach the full fruition of this delicious ode.  But it's worth going through the necessary process, to reap its full enjoyment:—

    Bacon has remarked, that there is no exquisite beauty that has not some strangeness in its proportions. Hood is a master of this unexpectedness, whether it startles with its laughter in his rich grotesquerie, or surprises with its rapid and crushing lyrical energy in thunder-strokes of thought.  He said his epitaph should be—'Here lies the man who spat more blood and made more puns than any other.'   He was indeed a marvellous punster—monarch of Pun-land.  All great humorists and wits have been fond of this wit of words.   Shakspere was always making them, and Douglas Jerrold will speak a bookful per day, when in the mood.

    But it has always been considered the lowest Species of wit; and it took the genius of Hood to legitimatise it, and render it respectable.  It was a great pity that he should have been compelled to break up his fire from heaven into such small sparks and brilliant scintillations.  He had to pick up his living at the point of his pen, and puns sold better than poetry.  He could turn any and everything to punning account, and scattered them by mouthfuls wherever he went.

    In him it was tolerable, because he was also a poet, and so frequently graced it with the presence of poetry.  But, since he set the example, it has been followed by many who have rendered the maker of puns a being to be avoided all earnest men, because nothing is sacred to his touch, no sanctuary safe from his grinning irreverence.  Hood's lowest wit has a delicate aroma, while that of these fellows stinks of smoke and stale beer.  Every one who can make a pun now sets up for a wit.  It is the age of punning, and penman almost signifies punman.  Poor dear Tom Hood and Laman Blanchard have something to answer for in all this broad-grin pasquinado.  If they could see what their flashing mirth, rollicking humour and sparkling wit have ended in—what barnacles have stuck on to the bulk of their fame to swim with them, they might well wish to forswear their claim to the foundership of what is called the 'Punch School.'  Not a word against 'Punch' itself.  Having the spirit of Jerrold and Editorial Lemon, it requires a little water; or how could it be Punch?  Only, sometimes we could wish for a little less of the third ingredient.  But around this 'Punch' there do congregate a company of conceited puppies, who have grown into sad dogs.  They return the fumes of punch in the most vapid effusions.  Mr Punch—to change our illustration—draws the crowd together, and these literary mountebanks perform their antics, and pick up their halfpence at the outskirts.  This would not be so bad if confined to the public street, but when the day is done, and the outdoor exhibition is ended, they disband, and individually inflict their ancient jokes and sorry sleight-of-hand on many unprotected circles of society.  This ambition to say smart things, and be thought funny, is working fatally in the literature of the day, and is sapping the very root of all earnestness.  A man will soon have to be ashamed of all serious earnestness in the presence of these modern Samsons, who wear such long hair, and slay with the jawbone of an ass.  Nor can we tolerate all the senseless levity that in certain quarters is fast eating out the sturdy spirit of our glorious Saxon language, or, without protest, permit these eunuchs of thought to replace the lofty English of Shakspeare, and Milton, and the great divines, with the slang of the cider-cellars, and the cantology of puppydom. We have had all too much of this irreverence and losel levity. Life is too real, too earnest, too solemn a thing, to be spent in producing or in reading such light literature.  We want something more of the Ironside earnestness in individual character, in our books, and in the national life. Earnestness is the root of greatness and heroism.  'They were in earnest,' and not 'They were only joking,' is the epitaph which history has inscribed in letters of light, or of blood, on the tombs of her illustrious—the heroes, martyrs, and teachers.

    Hood has been charged with being irreligious, because he was unmerciful to the 'unco gude' in their own conceit—those who make long prayers in the market-place, and pull long faces in the vestry—those who wear their religion like a Sunday cloak, which is brushed up once a-week, and put on when the apron of trade is cast aside; the pile of which cloak he would occasionally stroke backwards, and ruffle its equanimity.  He ridiculed pretence; he hated humbug; he exposed all lying abominations, all Pharisaical cant—but religion! never.  Take the ode to 'Rae Wilson,' which we consider one of the finest defences of genuine religion ever made.  Remember that a man is building for truth when he destroys that which is false; and that is just what Hood does in this ode.  The wolf's clothing, the mask of hypocrisy, and the suit of sanctimony, are here stripped off the quacks and pretenders, and consumed to ashes in the fires of his scorn and wit.  I quote a bit of his mind and creed; and if the reader think him wrong and blind, who, as he himself says—

Such a picture as the following is scarcely likely to be in favour with

But who shall deny that it has many life-likenesses, and why should it not be thus framed?—

    Many golden nuggets of wit and wisdom might be picked out of the poem of 'Miss Kilmanseg and her precious leg'—that splendid satire on the love and worship of wealth, bowing down to the golden calf, so prevalent in the time of Hood, but which is happily unknown to the world in which we live at present.  It is supposed that 'Miss Kilmanseg' and Jerrold's 'Man Made of Money' gave the death-blow to that vice which was wont to turn so many of those human beings into two-legged guinea-pigs, who preferred that transformation to the more hirsute one accorded by Circe to the devotees that besieged her shrine.  The father of Miss Kilmanseg is thus finely sketched:—

    It is time we turn from Hood the Punster, to Hood the Poet. The punster has partially taken the shine out of the poet, on account of his brilliancy.  And so great was his wit, so excellent his fooling, that many are apt to forget how richly he was otherwise endowed—how rare was his ethereal fancy—how deep the faculty divine—how clear the poet's vision.  But he lived by literature, and he made puns when he should have been writing immortal poems.  As a specimen of his serious sweetness and delicate fancy, take the 'Death-Bed.'

    As a companion piece, we quote two remarkable stanzas, to note, in addition to their calm chaste beauty, the allusion to the smell of earth coming and as health ebbed and returned.  A near relation of mine, three days before death, begged for a sod of earth, and she hugged it, smelling it as though it had been a bunch of flowers, continually praising its fragrance until she died.

    This poem is as wealthy in poetic thought as that same sea is of gems, and it has heart home-thrusts of pathos unexcelled.  In the 'Plea of the Midsummer Fairies,' there is a bloom of poetry freshly caught from fairyland, as it existed in the dewy morning of imagination.  We have looked upon Hood in various phases of his manifold character, and now come to the grandest and most enduring —the poet of the poor.

    The life of the poor! how full it is of peculiar poetry.  What a poet he will be who shall one day burst upon the wondering world, and tell the tearful story—tearful for joy and for sorrow!  Tell the heroic histories there inscribed on poverty's prison walls, to hear which, alone, life were worth living for.  Write the unwritten poetry, chronicle the unknown greatness and the wasted bravery, the love strong as death, the sacrifice deep as the grave, the lonely wrestlings with the devil, the burnings of precious life-furniture, just to make a blaze wherewith to scare away the wolf hunger that was howling at the door, and glaring in at the window, for some beloved's sake!  The temptation, the struggle, the fall, and the victory, on hidden stages of human life.  What a picture to weep exulting tears over, is that in 'Alton Locke' (copied from life), where the poor seamstress, though starving, rejoices that she is ugly and deformed, and, therefore, unmarketable among those who purchase the defiled name of Love! and many such an iris of loveliness has been painted on the dark background of poverty, many such a moral glory has gilded the shining ones of the damp cellar and foodless garret.

    Hood has but snatched a leaf from the great book of poetry that has been buried in this hiding-place, where it was little imagined to be concealed; and the world will applaud the effort for ever.  Who would have thought that a poor outcast girl, friendless and homeless, pelted by the pitiless wind and rain, pointed at by the finger of scorn, hounded out of society, till she madly plunged off Waterloo Bridge, and hid her frenzied eyes in the cold but welcoming hands of death, would have called forth a strain of poetry that should thrill to the heart of universal humanity, and melt the hard stern world into tears?  The thing had occurred many a time and oft, and the announcement had been made at a million breakfast-tables, without any lifting of eyes or eyebrows.  The callous Levite Society had seen a hundred such wrecks—a hundred such suicides, who had taken the leap, in the dark midnight, from the fatal Bridge of Sighs, and it had passed on its way with mirth arid music, sinning and suffering, glorying and rejoicing, but all unheeding of the victims and the wreckages that were strewn by the wayside.  But the poet—the good Samaritan—comes by, and the wounded are soothed by his healing hand, and the dead have decent burial, with the unction of melodious tears.  The dark, the mean, the abject, are instantly radiated, and the dead past lifts a radiant brow, in the light of his loving countenance.  It is the blessed and Christlike privilege of poetry to take to her bosom whatsoever the world hath cast out.  In her large heart is room for what the sects are too narrow for.  She will take the maimed, the halt, the blind, and the leprous, and restore them to the human fold.  She will discover a soul of good in things evil, and penetrate to the fountainhead of the waters of love, in the nature where it is choked up with weeds and dust.  She will seek to win back the fallen and degraded, and set the spirit once again upon the throne it has lost.  And thus, from the death of a poor forsaken suicide, does the poet Hood draw lessons of charity, and pleads with such a tender pity, as though it were the voice of a loving sister, till the hardest heart is touched, and tears stand in the eyes of those who seldom weep.

    With what a shudder the prayer went through startled society, pure and pleading, as the sound of vespers breaking on the saturnalia of Bacchanals.  Hood was little known to the world as a poet, until it recognised him one morning chanting this thrilling strain on the 'Bridge of Sighs.'  Then came that terrible 'Song of the Shirt' straight home to men's business and bosoms, fastening shirt-like close to naked nature.  It was a lightning-flash of revelation, rifting the dark of a long and dismal night, which was made up of ignorance above, and misery below.  In the middle of that grim night did that fearful glare and piercing cry wake up the wealthy and the great from their luxurious beds and 'lazy purples,' and, as they looked down from their high windows, the poet showed them the human lives they were wearing out—the blood of little children wrung out to dye their costly crimson—the human hearts that were daily breaking—the thousands of humanity's sons and daughters that were born to be used up, starved, and transported annually, as surely as corn is grown to be eaten—how their path through the world, and the pavement of their palace fronts, were strewn with the wrecks of trampled human-kind—how the track of their chariot-wheels was followed with groans, and curses, and tears of blood—how it was their brethren who were for ever broken on the wheel of their car of progress—their sisters who stitched their lives into their work for 4.½d. per day, and were driven into the midnight streets and lanes to sell the sweet name of Love for bread, in order that they might eke out their means of subsistence.  From their lofty windows they stared aghast; some, indeed, cursed the voice of the poet that had so rudely broken their voluptuous dream, and they slunk back to their silken pillows.  But the rest stared on, and could not turn away.  The 'Song of the Shirt' was the first summons of the army of the poor which had besieged the citadel of wealth.  The very music of it was like the march of ten thousand men, who come with dogged step, set teeth, and flashing eyes, to demand redress for their long sufferings and wrongs.  It had an ominous sound.  Men looked at one another, and, for every poor one pale with want, there was a rich one white with fear.  The wealthy had not known, or did not care to know, what want and wretchedness existed around them, and how small a space they were from the gnashings of hunger, the effluvia of disease, and the seething fires of revolution.  They saw not, or shut their eyes to, the scenes in which the bravest human heart might well despair, go mad, curse God, and die—where the children of labour, born in tears, are dragged up in misery, often sapped of their nature's finer feelings, or hurried by them into sin and crime, in the spring of life, robbed of their manhood, and left to toil on, starving, and starving still toil on, till they end their life's dark destiny in the pauper's grave, or the convict cemetery.  None but the poor know what the poor endure.  But this song led England to see that there were, in London alone, 33,500 poor women, working for from 2.½d. to 5d. per day.

    That the splendid fabrics of her manufacture were partly composed of human life—that England's hands were red with the blood of her martyred children, that her throne was built on broken hearts, and the root of her greatness drew its sustenance from rotting humanity—it rang through England like the trumpet that calls to judgment, or like the voice of the prophet of old, seeking for the ten righteous men to save the doomed city, and it was successful in finding them in time to avert the coming destruction.  It touched the truest and tenderest string in the heart of aristocracy.  Society began to investigate the appalling truth.  It went down into the dens of poverty and saw what a real hell was there.  It discovered, that side by side with our boasted magnificence was the most hideous squalor, and the most alarming misery.  Sympathy for starved seamstresses, and tailors sweated down to starvation-point, was roused, and speedily became active in bettering the condition of the poor.  Hood took the 'shirt' from the hands of that poor woman who sat in unwomanly rags, and turned it into a very Nessus shirt on the back of England.  The 'Song of the Shirt' called forth a tide of feeling so strong and impetuous, that it threw down and overleaped many an ancient barrier that had so long divided the rich from the poor.  It was an equivalent for the horrible poor-law system, which severed the last human link between them—a link that existed even in feudal times, when the lord and the serf did meet sometimes at the hall or castle-door, and charity and gratitude shook hands.

    Who can compute the influence that these songs exerted for good, or how powerfully they contributed to bring about the many benevolent and noble schemes put forth and adopted, to alleviate the distress that existed?  That it was great, we know—how great, we can never know.  This was the waking at midnight; and society caught a glimpse, by the light of the poet's lamp, of that great morning that has yet to break upon us, when we shall look upon the face of each other, and see them in a new light; and know that we are brothers—brothers who have been tearing each other in the hand-to-throat strife, with the gloom hanging so thick and heavy about us, and the infernal din ringing so loudly in our ears—brothers who, having drifted into this Maelstrom of competition, like the brothers in Poe's tale, are struggling in a death-struggle for the last spar of safety, endeavouring to rise up on the floating wreck of each other's fortunes.  What a fearful waking for many that will be!  And it will come, although the world, having some thought of what awaits it, still wraps itself round as comfortably as it can, slouches the hat over the eyes to shut out as much as possible, sticks cotton in its ears, sets a million wheels in motion, to stifle the moans and the cries, and hurries on its whirlwind way, 'arm-in-arm with the flesh and the devil.'  In these, and some other songs, Hood is the poet of the poor; he uttered that which had never before found utterance. The poor owe him their hearts' best thanks.  He had an eye to see into their secret sorrows, and a heart keenly alive to their wrongs and silent sufferings.  His own life was a hard, up-hill struggle.  Arthur Hallam has recorded that 'pain is the deepest thing we have in our nature, and union through pain has always seemed more real and holy than any other;' and such was the nature of Hood's relationship to the poor.  He had drank of the cup of bitterness, drank to the dregs of the sorrow of existence. He had run the gauntlet of a file of adverse circumstances, buffeting and casting him down on either hand.  His life was beaten out by blows, and the armour that he put on as warrior in the cause of humanity was thus welded stronger than iron.  He was a brave, earnest, manful man, and it was a noble heart on which he rested his lever to move the world.  His life has never been written, but we think it easy to divine what manner of man he was.  We can put out our hand through the dark that lies between us, and tell the very beating of his living pulse.  He was heroic enough to fold his robe round him, and smile, while pain and want were tearing his entrails.  He was all too sensitive and shy to let the world know how it went with hint.  Unfortunately, whenever there is a man to be rescued, and one who is worth rescuing, there is no one particular person to do it.  After he is dead and gone, many would have done it, and wonder why it was not done. What is everybody's business, is no one's.  The aggregate body of the world is slow and unwieldy, and, like the English Cabinet, it is always too late.  'Tis a brave, thankful world in the end, but it seldom discerns the true thing wanted at the right time.

    In conclusion, let us look for a moment behind the curtain of our poet, when he played Mr Merryman, who in the pages of 'Punch,' and in his public and private whims and oddities, created more laughter in his time than any other ten men put together, and we find that his mirth and merriment were often like that of the poor clown who had to make merry on the stage while his child lay dead at home, and make the sides of his audience shake with laughter, while his own inside was trembling with weakness. Necessity, the stern, imperious taskmaster, stood over poor Hood, and made him laugh for his living, like a master draper whom, we once knew in a house that we lived in, who, having taken a dislike to the serious look of one of the young men, said to him, 'Come, sir, I don't allow any one to look black or frown in my shop.  Now, sir, let me instantly see a smile on your face.'  This was done for very wantonness, in his love of being tyrannical.  Instead of knocking him down, the poor fellow burst into tears.

    Looking from Hood, with his best face on, and broadest grin, before the public, to Hood in his own study, is very like a realisation of that anecdote told of Liston, the great farce actor, whose face was so droll and provocative of risibility that you could not look upon it seriously, who was the nightly delight of uproarious thousands, and whom people went to see, if they wanted to get rid of the blue devils and shake the cobwebs out of their internals.  Liston, off the stage, was often a poor hypochondriac, sunk into a state of deadly despondency.  On one occasion, being lower, darker, sadder than usual, he went to consult old Dr Abernethy.  The doctor saw that it was extreme lowness of spirits, and knew that he wanted medicine for the mind, and not for the stomach.  He did not know who his patient was, and so he said to hint, 'You only want cheering up; a good hearty laugh would do you good.  I'll tell you what'll cure you.'—'What?' said Liston.  'Go and see Liston!' said the old doctor; 'he'll settle you.'  I daresay the actor took his advice, without deriving much benefit from the prescription.  Hood was similarly circumstanced; and that which was medicine to thousands beside, had no healing power for him.  He always turned the sunny side of his life to the world, while he himself sat in darkness.  When very frail and feeble, and in the illness from which he never recovered, he thus gives us a bit of his cheerful philosophy.  In the preface to 'Hood's Own' inimitable collection of prose and verse, and grotesque etchings, he says:—

'In the absence of a certain thin "blue-and-yellow" visage and attenuated figure—whose effigy may one day be affixed to this work—you will not be prepared to learn that some of the merriest effusions in the forthcoming numbers have been the relaxations of a gentleman literally enjoying bad health—the carnival, so to speak, of a personified Jour Maigre.  The very fingers so aristocratically slender, that now hold the pen, hint plainly of the "ills that flesh, is heir to;" my coats have become greatcoats; my pantaloons are turned into trousers; and, by a worse bargain than Peter Schlemihl's, I seem to have retained my shadow, and sold my substance. In short, as happens to prematurely-old port wine, I am of a bad colour, with very little body.  But what then?  That emaciated hand still lends a hand to embody in words and sketches the creations or recreations of a merry fancy; those gaunt sides yet shake heartily as ever at the grotesques, and arabesques, and droll picturesques that my good genius (a Pantagruelian Familiar) charitably conjures up, to divert me from more sombre realities.  How else could I have converted a serious illness into a comic wellness?  By what other agency could I have transported myself, as a Cockney would say, from Dullage to Grinnage?  It was far from a practical joke to be laid up in ordinary in a foreign land, under the care of physicians quite as much abroad as myself with the case; indeed, the shades of the gloaming were stealing over my prospect; but I resolved that, like the sun, so long as my day lasted, I would look upon the bright side of everything.  The raven croaked, but I persuaded myself that it was the nightingale; there was the smell of the mould, but I remembered that it nourished the violets.  However my body might cry craven, my mind luckily had no mind to give in.  My physician tells me that anatomically my heart is hung lower than usual; but what of that?  The more need to keep it up. . .Gentle reader, how do you like my laughing philosophy?  The joyous cheers you have just heard come from a crazy vessel that has clawed by miracle off a lee-shore, and I, the skipper, am sitting down to my grog, and recounting to you the tale of past danger, with the manoeuvres that were used to escape the perilous point.'

    And thus he bore up and held on, cheerfully and bravely to the last, under many a terrible circumstance.  Though the vessel of his life was frail and weather-worn, he would not desert it cowardly, but steered it right on into the harbour, which, we trust, was that haven of promise where the storms never rage, and sorrows come not, and there is no more pain, but the storm-tossed spirit folds its weary wings, and the toil-worn mariner of life's sea finds rest upon the bosom of eternal peace.

_____________________

Also by Gerald Massey:

The 'Life and Writing of Thomas Hood', published in Volume 114 of the Quarterly Review, 1863;

A review of 'The Works of Thomas Hood. Edited, with Notes, by his Son, published in the Athenæum, April 11, 1863.